Rogue-Nation Discussion Board
Judge Rules Illinois Public Transit Firearms Carry Ban Unconstitutional - Printable Version

+- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Rogue Politics (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=47)
+--- Forum: Political news and more (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=50)
+--- Thread: Judge Rules Illinois Public Transit Firearms Carry Ban Unconstitutional (/showthread.php?tid=2327)



Judge Rules Illinois Public Transit Firearms Carry Ban Unconstitutional - 727Sky - 09-04-2024

Check link for the rest of the article...
https://lists.theepochtimes.com/links/s74Az9BnRA/Jlid8tcrj/b3XK0cBSvO/3l1kCBayqm

Quote:A federal judge recently ruled that Illinois’s ban on carrying guns in public transportation and in transportation facilities is unconstitutional, citing the Supreme Court’s 2022 landmark decision.
“After an exhaustive review of the parties’ filings and the historical record, as required by Supreme Court precedent, the Court finds that Defendants failed to meet their burden to show an American tradition of firearm regulation at the time of the Founding that would allow Illinois to prohibit Plaintiffs—who hold concealed-carry permits—from carrying concealed handguns for self-defense onto the CTA and Metra,” U.S. District Judge Iain D. Johnston wrote in his Aug. 30 opinion, referring to two Chicago-area transportation systems.
The judge was cited the Supreme Court’s decision, N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which found a New York law unconstitutional and that the ability to carry a pistol in public was a right guaranteed under the Second Amendment. The decision also said that, in future decisions, the judiciary should evaluate firearms regulations in light of the “historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
Under the Supreme Court’s 2022 standard for seeing whether firearms regulations fall under the Constitution, the government must demonstrate that the measure is within U.S. historical traditions.
Treating “any place where the government would want to protect public order and safety as a sensitive place casts too wide a net ... [and] would seem to justify almost any gun restriction,” Johnston wrote.
He also rejected Illinois state attorneys’ arguments that the Bruen test did not apply in this case because the state, which owns the property, can regulate what individuals take onto its property.



RE: Judge Rules Illinois Public Transit Firearms Carry Ban Unconstitutional - p358 - 09-05-2024

Quote, "because the state, which owns the property, can regulate what individuals take onto its property."

This is banal and needs the Supreme Court to rule once and for all.

The State does not own the property ... the people own the property ... the state is tasked by the people and for the people to run and maintain the property for and on behalf of the people.

This wrong thinking has to change.

PSmile