Quote:HUGE NEWS

The state of Louisiana just voted to BAN the WEF and WHO agenda.

Saying that they shall have no jurisdiction or power within the state.

The bill now passed both the Senate and the House.

This is MASSIVE news yet nobody in the mainstream media is reporting on it.

That's why I'm here, to bring you the news that is being censored by the mainstream media.

Earlier, the Senate in Louisiana voted 37 - 0 to pass a bill that will BAN the WEF, WHO and the UN from having any jurisdiction or power within the state.

Now, the House have also voted 69 - 22 in favor of the bill. This is massive news.

Here is what it says in the bill.

"The World Health Organization, United Nations and the World Economic Forum shall have no jurisdiction or power within the state of Louisiana. No rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy or mandate of any kind of the World Health Organization, United Nations and the World Economic Forum shall be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency, department, board, commission, political subdivision, governmental entity of the state, parish, municipality, or any other political entity".

Looks like they are rejecting not only the WEF agenda, but also the WHO and UN agenda.

This comes as 22 State Attorney Generals have called to reject the WHO pandemic treaty, and several Australian politicians have done so as well.

We are seeing more and more people saying NO.

Quote:BREAKING: Louisiana House has passed the bill, 69-22, that previously passed the state Senate to not allow any rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate of any kind from the WHO, UN, or WEF to be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency.

Quote:In a significant move, the Louisiana House recently passed a bill with a vote of 69-22 that prohibits the enforcement or implementation of any rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate from the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations (UN), or World Economic Forum (WEF) within the state of Louisiana or by any of its agencies. This decision marks a clear stance by the state legislature to maintain autonomy and sovereignty over its own governance and decision-making processes.

This bill has stirred up a considerable amount of debate and discussion among lawmakers, stakeholders, and the general public. Supporters of the bill argue that it is crucial for the state to retain control over its own policies and regulations without external influence from international organizations. They believe that this measure will help protect the interests and values of the people of Louisiana.
On the other hand, critics of the bill express concerns about the potential implications of isolating the state from global standards and initiatives. They argue that international cooperation and collaboration are essential in addressing global challenges such as public health, climate change, and economic development. By restricting the influence of organizations like the WHO, UN, and WEF, Louisiana could be limiting its access to valuable resources, information, and expertise.
The passing of this bill reflects a broader trend of states asserting their independence and pushing back against perceived overreach from international bodies. In recent years, there has been a growing skepticism towards global governance and a renewed focus on national sovereignty. Louisiana’s decision to limit the authority of external organizations within its borders is part of this larger movement towards decentralization and self-determination.
It is important to note that this bill does not mean that Louisiana is completely cutting ties with the WHO, UN, or WEF. Rather, it is a statement of intent to prioritize state-level decision-making and to carefully consider the implications of external regulations and mandates. The state will still have the ability to engage with these organizations on a case-by-case basis and to participate in international initiatives that align with its interests and values.
Moving forward, it will be interesting to see how this bill is implemented and what impact it will have on the state of Louisiana. Will other states follow suit and pass similar legislation? How will this decision affect Louisiana’s relationships with international partners and organizations? These are questions that will likely be explored in the coming months as the implications of this bill unfold.
In conclusion, the passing of this bill by the Louisiana House represents a significant development in the ongoing debate over state sovereignty and international cooperation. By asserting its independence from external influences, Louisiana is sending a clear message about its commitment to self-governance and autonomy. Whether this decision will have positive or negative consequences remains to be seen, but it is certainly a bold move that will shape the state’s future trajectory.