Quote:There's a maxim from Sun Tzu, the military strategist who wrote The Art of War, that has stood the test of time: "'to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill." Well that's exactly what the Chinese Communist Party is doing by developing weapons that connect to your brain. In this episode of China Uncensored, we look at China's brain weapons, how it hopes to use them in war, and why the US is so concerned about this.

(07-20-2023, 03:42 PM)Ninurta Wrote: If true, this is grounds for a pre-emptive nuclear strike. Violating the brain of a human for purposes of control is the ultimate violation of a human being. We see abusive husbands punished for this all the time, albeit their methods are more low-tech. Turning a person into a programmable zombie is the worst crime I can imagine. Kill me if you must, and can, but leave my mind alone. Don't zombify me and leave me living.

Some time between 2008 and 2016, I witnessed several people do a complete 180 degree turn in their political thinking, to the point that I stated questioning if they were even them any more. This news makes me wonder if they may not have been guinea pigs for the CCP and this program.

The mountains are pretty effective at blocking radio waves (which is why I cannot get cell signal at my house), if that is how this disruption is accomplished, it breathes new life to the Biblical prophecy that in the last days, people would flee to the mountains and beg the mountains to collapse upon them rather than submit.

I wonder how this might tie into 5G, and the fact that China makes just about all of the 5G equipment the US uses....

Maybe tinfoil hats weren't a goofy idea after all....

.

(07-20-2023, 03:59 PM)Kenzo Wrote:

(07-20-2023, 03:42 PM)Ninurta Wrote: If true, this is grounds for a pre-emptive nuclear strike. Violating the brain of a human for purposes of control is the ultimate violation of a human being. We see abusive husbands punished for this all the time, albeit their methods are more low-tech. Turning a person into a programmable zombie is the worst crime I can imagine. Kill me if you must, and can, but leave my mind alone. Don't zombify me and leave me living.

Some time between 2008 and 2016, I witnessed several people do a complete 180 degree turn in their political thinking, to the point that I stated questioning if they were even them any more. This news makes me wonder if they may not have been guinea pigs for the CCP and this program.

The mountains are pretty effective at blocking radio waves (which is why I cannot get cell signal at my house), if that is how this disruption is accomplished, it breathes new life to the Biblical prophecy that in the last days, people would flee to the mountains and beg the mountains to collapse upon them rather than submit.

I wonder how this might tie into 5G, and the fact that China makes just about all of the 5G equipment the US uses....

Maybe tinfoil hats weren't a goofy idea after all....

.

I thought Huawei  was banned in US ?  I may remember wrong.  

Several Eiropean countrys has denyed Huawei 5G i think,

I use baseball cap that has shielding fabric inside to blok radio , the reason is i come to very sensitive to RF these days and get sick if have to be any longer time in radiation.

(07-20-2023, 05:39 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: There has been a war going on for our minds for centuries. Each year they get better at it, and the advances in technology has brought their ability to control what we belief, think, and how we react to the apex level.

If they are allowing us to see what China is doing, how much more advanced do you think what we are doing is?

(07-20-2023, 05:52 PM)Ninurta Wrote: Their brain control seems to not be working on me, so far. Maybe I just lack a brain, and so they have no target.

I doubt the US is anywhere near as advanced in the field as the CCP. They consistently whoop the crap out of us these days in tech matters. Take a look at any tech item you care to, and count the number of times you see "China", "Made in China", or Chinese characters on labeling.

.

(07-20-2023, 06:37 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: We are safe. They are not going to waste time and money on us old folk that are the end of our rope.

Indeed almost every electronic device is made in China, which speaks volumes to me. Why would you give your supposed enemy that much power over you, and finance them?

Quote:Either you are your enemy's bitch, or you have a rabbit up your sleeve. Either way, our time is short and hopefully we will be long gone before the chickens come home to roost.

Quote:Mindblowing: advances in brain tech spur push for 'neuro-rights'

The South American nation Chile is aiming to be the world's first to legally protect citizens' "neuro-rights," with lawmakers expected to pass a constitutional reform blocking technology that seeks to "increase, diminish or disturb" people's mental integrity without their consent.

"If this technology manages to read (your mind), before even you're aware of what you're thinking," he told AFP, "it could write emotions into your brain: life stories that aren't yours and that your brain won't be able to distinguish whether they were yours or the product of designers."

The Chilean bill contains four main fields of legislation: guarding the human mind's data, or neuro-data; fixing limits to the neuro-technology of reading and especially writing in brains; setting an equitable distribution and access to these technologies; and putting limits on neuro-algorithms.

The science has opened the possibility of designing hybrid humans with artificially enhanced cognitive abilities.

Quote:What is it?

U.S. Army’s Directed Energy strategy instructs the Army to begin fielding Directed Energy (DE) weapon systems as part of its transformation to a Multi-Domain capable force. DE weapons offer a significant defensive capability against Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS); rotary- and fixed-wing threats; and rocket, artillery, and mortar (RAM) threats.

The execution of this strategy requires coordinated efforts across Army and Joint stakeholders, including the Army Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO), the Army Futures Command (AFC), and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology.

What are the current and past efforts of the Army?

The Army is leveraging proven technologies developed in the science and technology (S&T) community in rapidly prototyping Directed Energy efforts.

As part of its modernization strategy, the Army is developing a variety of DE weapons, which include both lasers and high-power microwaves. AFC and RCCTO developed a DE strategy to field prototypes to operational units starting in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022. In support, the RCCTO is working the following efforts:

    DE Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (DE M-SHORAD): a 50kW-class laser to protect Divisions and Brigade Combat Teams from UAS, rotary-wing aircraft, and RAM threats.
    Indirect Fire Protection Capability-High Energy Laser (IFPC-HEL): a 300kW-class laser that will protect fixed and semi-fixed sites from stressing UAS; rotary and fixed-wing aircraft; and RAM threats.
    IFPC-High Power Microwave (HPM) intended for Counter-UAS, particularly groups and swarms; paired with IFPC-HEL as part of a layered defense to protect fixed and semi-fixed sites.

What continued efforts does the Army have planned?

The Army plans to:

•     Deliver a DE M-SHORAD prototype platoon in FY22
  
•     Team with Joint services to utilize the High Energy Laser Scaling Initiative (HELSI) contract of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, execute an IFPC-HEL tech demonstration in FY22 and deliver a prototype platoon in FY24
  
•     Partner with the Air Force and in coordination with the Joint Counter-small UAS Office (JCO), deliver an IFPC-HPM prototype platoon in FY24
  

The Army will continue DE S&T in areas of Lethality, Improving Size, Weight and Power (SWaP) and Extending Effective Range as these prototyping efforts transition to the Program of Record.

Why is this important to the Army?

DE weapons significantly contribute to the Army’s execution of Multi-Domain Operations and offer a strategic tool in the fight against low-cost threats, such as drones, found on the modern battlefield.

Army Directed Energy Strategy

Quote:DHS Cybersecurity Agency Labels Private Thoughts ‘Critical Infrastructure’ To Justify Censoring You
By: Samuel Boehlke
June 02, 2023
3 min read


  Image CreditGage Skidmore / Flickr / CC BY-SA 2.0

Share

• Share Article on Facebook
  
• Share Article on Twitter
  
• [/url]
  

[*]Share Article on Truth Social
[*]

• [email=?subject=DHS Cybersecurity Agency Labels Private Thoughts ‘Critical Infrastructure’ To Justify Censoring] Share Article via Email [/email]
  
• 
  

A cybersecurity agency within the Department of Homeland Security has been engaging in censorship and then justifying it under the guise of “critical infrastructure security,” Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry [url=https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/landry-testimony.pdf]testified this week before the House Select Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government.
Called to testify based on findings in his ongoing lawsuit, Louisiana and Missouri v. Biden et al., Landry said DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has classified American “thoughts, ideas, and beliefs” as “critical infrastructure.” To “control” these “cognitive assets,” Landry added, CISA and “numerous federal agencies” then use private entities to orchestrate what amounts to unconstitutional government censorship: The government flags dissenting beliefs for Big Tech companies to silence in an attempt to bypass the First Amendment.
[READ: Meet The Partisans Who Wove The Censorship Complex’s Vast And Tangled Web]
“It is axiomatic that the U.S. government and its officials cannot … circumvent the First Amendment by inducing, threatening, and/or colluding with private entities to suppress protected speech. Shockingly, this is exactly what has occurred through this federal censorship enterprise,” Landry said.
CISA claims to be the “national coordinator for critical infrastructure security and resilience,” and, among other things, purports to address risks from “foreign influence operations and disinformation.” But as The Federalist’s Senior Editor John Daniel Davidson wrote in these pages last year, “A security and surveillance apparatus originally constructed to keep us safe from terrorists has been transformed into an instrument of domestic surveillance, and is now being used against us.”
Behind all CISA’s legal jargon, Landry’s case has exposed the roots of a widespread censorship operation, obvious in efforts to affect election outcomes and silence speech critical of the regime on everything from Covid-19 lockdowns to FBI corruption.

“CISA serves as a ‘switchboard’ for sending disfavored information from state and local officials to the necessary social media company to ensure content-moderation policies are applied,” Landry said.
According to Landry, CISA and other government agencies use three strategies to push companies to censor: “public pressure … coercion … and deception.” These Orwellian tactics are systemic:

Quote:Still, this conspiracy to control the thoughts and minds of the American public is deeply entrenched, with social media companies meeting with federal officials on a regular basis. These meetings are often focused on streamlining and maximizing censorship efforts related to flagging, fact-checking, and reporting on ‘borderline’ or disfavored content, even parodies, comedic material, and criticism of the President. Yet while many federal officials from the President on down have accused social media companies of “killing people” for not censoring enough content, this censorship enterprise has likely resulted in significant loss of life by ensuring the American public did not gain true and accurate information during a global pandemic.

While Landry cautioned that this government censorship cannot be allowed to continue, he said it is likely to because bad actors have succeeded in their censorship with virtually no accountability. To that end, the Louisiana attorney general called for consequences including “the termination of federal employment and forfeiture of retirement benefits for those who have
betrayed their oaths of office by silencing what the White House has characterized as the ‘low
quality speech’ of our fellow Americans.” He also urged Congress to pass a law criminalizing federal government censorship and establishing recourse for silenced Americans, involving punitive and monetary damages against the censors.
“These comprehensive measures are essential to preventing large-scale constitutional violations of Americans’ First Amendment rights,” Landry concluded.