Rogue-Nation Discussion Board
Britain Today - Printable Version

+- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Around the World - Worldwide News (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=61)
+--- Forum: Europe (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=64)
+--- Thread: Britain Today (/showthread.php?tid=63)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


RE: Britain Today - gortex - 04-13-2025

(04-13-2025, 08:16 PM)BIAD Wrote:
(04-13-2025, 07:53 PM)gortex Wrote: 1,268 illegal migrants were ferried to England from France last week with figures showing 656 arrived yesterday from 11 boats bringing the number of arrivals so far this year to 8,064 , at this point last year the number stood at 7,567.

We are being bled dry by these bastards and our government is like a rabbit in the headlights , civil unrest is coming.
Huh

Yep, a craft -usually a rubber dingy, is used by the illegal invaders and the flap-mouth politicians along with
their supposed 'defenders' of Britain's borders cannot use the basic logistics to stop the boats coming across.

A dingy doesn't just appear out of thin air on a limit area of the French coast... and they know this.
Sure

Yeah Coopers claim that they are targeting the people smugglers is as stupid as we thought when she first announced it , this is managed migration of illegals in all but name given as we are bringing them here.

What happens when they run out of available hotel rooms , anyone with a spare room paid to take them in ?

I'm both angry and sad at what is going on , angry because of what is happening and sad for what we have lost.


RE: Britain Today - BIAD - 04-13-2025

The 'fleeing war' excuse is long forgotten now.


27 February 2025 -BBC.

'Almost 37,000 people crossed the English Channel in small boats in 2024.
The number of people claiming asylum in the UK during the year to December 2024 was the highest since
records began, in 1979.

Who is crossing the Channel in small boats?
According to the latest Home Office figures, external, Afghans were the top nationality arriving by small boat
in 2024. Syrians made up the second largest group, followed by people from Iran, Vietnam and Eritrea.
These five nationalities accounted for 61% of all small-boat arrivals.

Albanians were the top nationality detected arriving by small boat in 2022, with 12,658 arrivals, but only 616
people came from the country in 2024.

Where do UK asylum seekers come from?
In the year to December 2024, the largest number of asylum seekers came from Pakistan, with more than
10,500 applications.

A quarter of all applications came from people from Pakistan, Afghanistan (8,508) and Iran (8,099),
Ukrainian refugees who came to the UK after Russia's invasion of their country are not included in the figures.

As at 17 December 2024, 267,200 visas had been issued to Ukrainian refugees, external, who came through
legal routes set up by the UK government. There are also separate arrangements for a few other specific groups,
such as some Afghan refugees and Hong Kong citizens.

The Home Office figures show 91% of the 7,800 refugees resettled in the UK in 2024 arrived through the Afghan
Resettlement Programme...'

[Image: attachment.php?aid=2790]


RE: Britain Today - gortex - 04-13-2025

Posts from Rupert Lowe MP , the man who should be our next PM.

Quote:The 656 new arrivals from yesterday should already be on a plane home - any self respecting country would do exactly that.

Instead, in Britain? They're in hotel accommodation, being catered/cared for and will very likely receive refugee status.

It is PURE INSANITY.
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/1911413643192791385?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Quote:Relying on vast mass immigration to staff the NHS is a damning indictment of how badly the system is operated.

We should be able to educate, train and pay our own people properly - let's invest in British youngsters for a change.

We can’t import our way out of every crisis.
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/1911492102346678549?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet



RE: Britain Today - gortex - 04-19-2025

If you want votes in London best get a London candidate , Reform UK have Raj Masud Forhad a Company Director of British Bangladeshi Community LTD.
[Image: GPwhr6dWIAAmR4w.jpg:large]


With just 36% white British living in London it's clear getting votes there is near impossible but I doubt Raj shares the wider public views on deportation of illegals , cutting legal immigration and securing our borders.

Former Reform Chairman Ben Habib does share the view of the wider public on deportation , cutting immigration and securing our borders and he has just started a new Right wing party called the Integrity Party   to fill the gap left by Reform since their move to the centre ground.

I can not in all good conscience vote Reform again they are not the party they claimed to be.

Free mobile learning hubs and free Gym membership ?
Huh


RE: Britain Today - gortex - 04-19-2025

About 50 squatters mainly from Eritrea are camping outside Westminster Cathedral ,

with arrivals about 1,000 a week I guess we've run out of hotels.
[Image: lcimg-531bf6f6-8230-4378-842d-4aa23d514b1a.png] At what do do they admit it's an invasion.


RE: Britain Today - BIAD - 05-21-2025

If anyone from out there among the stars looks for clues in order to invade Earth, look no further than
the English Channel. The degradation of the British knows no bounds.
Sure


Quote:Migrant boat forces Dunkirk flotilla to divert

'A flotilla of “Little Ships” crossing the English Channel to commemorate the Dunkirk evacuation was
forced to divert so Border Force could escort a migrant boat.

The fleet of 66 boats set sail from Ramsgate, Kent, to Dunkirk at 6am on Wednesday to commemorate
the 85th anniversary of Operation Dynamo. It was intended as a “poignant tribute to the bravery and
sacrifice” of the Dunkirk evacuations, where 1,000 British pleasure boats were used in the rescue of
more than 300,000 Allied soldiers from the Nazi advance.

[Image: cd67f4486e5ba0a6bc667ee1c9205f71a960a33d.webp]
The PC Flotilla.

But the commemorations were disrupted when Border Force and the French navy demanded that the
flotilla be diverted to provide a one-nautical mile exclusion zone for a migrant boat. The small boat,
which had been launched from northern France earlier on Wednesday, was being escorted across
the Channel by the French navy and UK Border Force.

Marine traffic audio heard by The Telegraph revealed that the “Little Ships” were told: “There is a
[French] warship on our head with a migrant [boat] close by. And we’ve been requested to give
one nautical mile distance from that vessel, over.”

A French voice, believed to be from the French navy, was then heard saying: “Thank you, sir.
Thank you very much.” One observer said: “They have asked the British ships to get out of the
way. It is one of the most important days in history and they are shoving them out of the way.”

Marine traffic maps showed a French warship and the French navy vessel Oyapock in the vicinity
of the flotilla as it crossed the Channel. The Association of Dunkirk Little Ships (ADLS), which
organised the voyage, had said it would ensure “the legacy of the Dunkirk little ships continues
to inspire future generations”.

This year’s crossing marks the first time the little ships have made the journey since 2015.
The flotilla was being escorted by ships from the Royal Navy and the Royal National Lifeboat
Institution (RNLI).

‘Sacrificed lives’
Chris Bannister, who owns a boat that served as a tug during the Dunkirk evacuation, said: “If we
don’t carry out the commemoration like we are today, then the people who have sacrificed their
lives many years ago, the memory of them, will stop.”

The rerouting of the flotilla came after two migrants died trying to cross the English Channel
overnight, according to the French coastguard. A rescue operation was launched after the pair
became unconscious on a boat carrying nearly 80 migrants, which left the shore from Gravelines,
northern France.

A French navy ship set out to make contact with the boat to recover the two people and 10
others who needed help. Crew from the vessel performed first aid on the two people, but a
medical team later confirmed their deaths.

All those rescued were taken to Calais, while the remaining migrants on the boat continued
their journey towards British waters under French navy surveillance.

Churchill’s speech
The “Little Ships” were volunteered to or requisitioned by the Government to be used in the
evacuations and crewed predominantly by Royal Navy personnel. Soldiers from Britain, the
Empire, France, Belgium, Poland and the Netherlands were evacuated across the Channel.
The operation prompted Winston Churchill’s “We shall fight on the beaches” speech in the
House of Commons as the evacuation was completed on June 4 1940.
The Home Office was approached for comment...'
Archived Telegraph Article:


RE: Britain Today - gortex - 05-21-2025

I'm not angry I'm just .... no actually I am angry.

I'm sick of the migrants first policy and I'm also sick of paying for them but a French warship giving orders to a commemorative floatily to mark the saving of our guys who had gone over to France to save those guys makes my blood boil.

Welcome back to the EU.
mediumsick


RE: Britain Today - gortex - 05-22-2025

Against the wishes of the people of Britain , the Chagossian people and many MPs in the House Kier Stalin has just sighed the deal that hands the Chagos Islands to Mauritius and put the UK into a 99 year lease deal for Diego Garcia which will cost us ,the Tax payer and our children's children , many many Billions.

Quote:UK signs deal to hand over Chagos Islands and lease back military base for £101m a year
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/clyvv04wk8zt
 

At what point does this guy become an Enemy of the State ?


RE: Britain Today - Ninurta - 05-22-2025

(05-22-2025, 04:46 PM)gortex Wrote: ... 

At what point does this guy become an Enemy of the State ?

I believe we are already well past that point, yet the state and the people are still doing nothing much about it.

"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing about it".

I'm afraid the UK will continue on this dangerous course until someone does something to change it.

In other news, the UK has acquiesced to the new WHO order quietly, without actually consulting any British citizens in the matter. Typical of this New Age.

.


RE: Britain Today - gortex - 05-22-2025

(05-22-2025, 07:41 PM)Ninurta Wrote:
(05-22-2025, 04:46 PM)gortex Wrote: ... 

At what point does this guy become an Enemy of the State ?

I believe we are already well past that point, yet the state and the people are still doing nothing much about it.

"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing about it".

I'm afraid the UK will continue on this dangerous course until someone does something to change it.

In other news, the UK has acquiesced to the new WHO order quietly, without actually consulting any British citizens in the matter. Typical of this New Age.

.

I agree , I think we passed that point when he started locking up people for writing words.

My theory is his plan , or given mission , is to bring the UK to its knees so we need IMF bailouts , we will then rejoin the EU because it's "best for the Country" , Kier will only last one term but that was probably in the plan hence the speed of his actions.



RE: Britain Today - Ninurta - 05-22-2025

(05-22-2025, 07:49 PM)gortex Wrote: I agree , I think we passed that point when he started locking up people for writing words.

My theory is his plan , or given mission , is to bring the UK to its knees so we need IMF bailouts , we will then rejoin the EU because it's "best for the Country" , Kier will only last one term but that was probably in the plan hence the speed of his actions.

If he lasts that entire term, then something is seriously wrong.

I don't know if recall elections are possible in the UK, but if they are, that is what needs to happen, post-haste. Get that poser out of there as rapidly as possible to minimize the damage he can do, and reverse as much of it as is possible. Leaving him in place is not going to accomplish that, it's only going to make things worse.

Invalidate all actions he has taken in office as illegitimate abuses of power.

When a politician is so extreme that even large segments of his own party decry him, then the iron is hot enough to strike. That is why Kamala Harris fared as poorly as she did in the most recent US elections - she was so extreme that even large parts of her own party said "whoa - are we really ready for THIS kind of radicalism?"

The US should have also had a recall election under Biden, but of course that never happened. The natural human proclivity is to endure so long as endurance is possible, hoping for a better future. However, when people can see that better future actively being dismantled in the present, then drastic measures are called for to halt it.

A recall election, if possible, is the fist step in that action. Barring that, there should at least be a vote of "no confidence" to hamstring the opposition, in my opinion.

When a man proclaims allegiance to Davos over and above his own constituency, the handwriting is on the wall.

In all honesty, Trump is not helping matters by continuing to work with the UK government. he ought to halt all cooperation with the UK that is possible to halt, and institute no new cooperation, until such time as the UK government returns to it's responsibility to it's constituency. Yes, that would be harsh, and in the short term probably painful, but in the long term it would be doing it's part to save the UK.

A cancer cannot be removed without painful measures - surgery, chemo, radiation, or all of the above. Komrade Starmer is, to all intents and purposes, a cancer feeding on Britain.

.


RE: Britain Today - gortex - 05-23-2025

Quote:Posted by Ninurta 
I don't know if recall elections are possible in the UK, but if they are, that is what needs to happen, post-haste.


Sadly the only way to bring down the government is from inside , a vote of No Confidence could be called in Parliament but as Labour have a large majority of MPs that would be like Turkeys voting for Christmas, they know they would lose their seats , they could ditch Starmer though and carry on under a new leader until the government collapses under the weight of its own BS.

Their is a possible scandal brewing that could finish him , understandably the MSM are looking the other way but there's a lot of speculation at the moment about the recent arson attacks on Starmer's House , a car he used to own and another property linked to him of which we have no details , 3 young Eastern European men have been arrested with at least one of them being a "male model" , questions are being asked how these young foreign men new where Starmer's house is , a car he used to own and the other property were.

Perhaps foreign agents or perhaps something a little more "exotic".

I've said enough.
Smile




RE: Britain Today - Ninurta - 05-23-2025

(05-23-2025, 03:58 PM)gortex Wrote: Perhaps foreign agents or perhaps something a little more "exotic".

I've said enough.
Smile

I have wondered at the motivations for Ukrainians, of all people, in the attacks on Starmer. BUT, if the attacks were financially motivated rather than politically motivated... getting "stiffed" on the entertainment bill for a private party, for example... then things could be much clearer.

.