![]() |
|
Interstellar visitor - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Technology and Advancements (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=77) +--- Forum: Science and Space...the Other Final Frontiers (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=79) +--- Thread: Interstellar visitor (/showthread.php?tid=2904) |
RE: Interstellar visitor - Ninurta - 11-06-2025 I also think they should call this an "interstellar object" rather than a comet, as the proper designation. It could bean interstellar cometary body, but it could also be an interstellar asteroid. We just haven't got any evidence to confirm either way. All we have, really, is flight path data and some distant, fuzzy photos. Also, keep in mind that "perihelion" is it's closest approach to the sun, and that in the case of this body, that closest approach is on the other side of the sun where we could not directly observe it. The "perihelion" photos above were taken as it cleared the sun and became visible again, meaning that we are looking at it along an axis where a potential tail would be hard to see, since it would be pointed almost directly away from us. From Earth at that time, a "tail" would only appear as a fuzzy halo around the object, perhaps with a heavier concentration on one side or the other as the angle changed to reveal any potential tail. This is because we would be looking along the axis of the tail rather than a side-on view of it. This does not mean a tail is not there, only that we would have a poor angle to see one if it was. It also does not mean a tail IS there, hence why it should be called an "object" rather than a "comet" at this point in time. "Object" covers all eventualities, from "comet" to "asteroid" to even "interstellar space craft". "Object" is non-judgmental and non-prejudicial. It just means "something solid enough that you wouldn't want to beat your head against it." It's possible that Avi Loeb has read "Rendezvous with Rama" one time too many. . RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-06-2025 I find it interesting that when it entered our neck of the woods 3I/Atlas was showing as red , then it turned green and now blue , primary colours , a signal perhaps or part of its propulsion ... maybe. Science needs to have an open mind but it seems to me science made up its mind early with Atlas , Comet Lemmon is a comet because it looks like a comet , I like my comets to look like comets. ![]() I also find it interesting that NASA still hasn't published the MRO hi rez images despite requests to do so , government shutdown or information shutdown ?.... hard to tell with NASA.
RE: Interstellar visitor - Kenzo1 - 11-07-2025 They just noticed new object , which is directly between Earth and 3i ATLAS .....C/2025 V1 BORISOV . it`s just a coincidence that it`s between Earth and 3i ATLAS......or is it ? ![]() But seems like it`s nothingburger.....objects move and the location is indeed coincidence . RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-07-2025 The Chinese space agency not only beat NASA to the punch following 3I/Atlas's visit to Mars they also made a gif. ![]() "Space , the final frontier ......" https://www.space.com/astronomy/comets/chinas-tianwen-1-mars-probe-captures-images-of-interstellar-comet-3i-atlas RE: Interstellar visitor - Ninurta - 11-07-2025 (11-07-2025, 06:32 PM)gortex Wrote: The Chinese space agency not only beat NASA to the punch following 3I/Atlas's visit to Mars they also made a gif. NASA letting those godless commies get ahead of us in the Space Race again, I see... It's the Sputnik debacle all over again! . RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-07-2025 Yep , they're using "government shutdown" as an excuse but Perseverance's view of Atlas were uploaded so why not MRO , pretty sure NASA teams aren't all sat at home. RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-08-2025 3I/Atlas just did interesting again , this morning an observation of Atlas was made and it seems to show jets outgassing toward the Sun , As Avi Loeb says "jet thrusters used for navigation of a spacecraft? We do not know." ![]() ![]() Quote:This morning, at 4.10 Universal Time (UT) on November 8, 2025, the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS showed a complex jet structure. M. Jäger, G. Rhemann and E. Prosperi observed 3I/ATLAS at 29 degrees separation from the Sun in the sky, as reported here. December 19th could be interesting.
RE: Interstellar visitor - F2d5thCav - 11-09-2025 Meanwhile, aboard 3I/Atlas ... Ship's captain: <sigh> " Inform home world that all attempts to gain the attention of the emerging civilization on the third planet of this system have failed. We are returning to base. "
RE: Interstellar visitor - Kenzo1 - 11-10-2025 Astronomer Frank Niebling, who operates the remote PixelSkies observatory in Spain, captured a new image of 3I/ATLAS. Source RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-10-2025 That image could either be the end of 3I/Atlas or proof that it is not a natural object , the amount of material Atlas has been outgassing in the 3 months we've been observing it plus the structural damage the outgassing would caused added to the stresses and strains of slingshotting the Sun could and probably should cause it to break up , unless the picture posted by Kenzo o shows its thrusters firing up of course. Latest post from Avi Loeb regarding that picture. Quote:I calculated here that their mass density is a few million proton masses per cubic centimeter at a distance of a million kilometers from 3I/ATLAS. The product of this mass density and the outflow speed, implies a mass flux of 5 billion tons per month per area of a million-kilometer on a side. I calculated here that the total mass associated with 3I/ATLAS is at least 33 billion tons based on its early dynamics. Adopting an outer surface area for the jetted material of order a million-kilometer squared, I find that 3I/ATLAS may have lost ~16% of its mass. This is consistent with the mass fraction required by its non-gravitational acceleration at perihelion, as I calculated here. Quote:“Houston, we have a problem” with the natural comet hypothesis! The required surface area of 3I/ATLAS to provide the inferred mass loss from the latest post-perihelion image, is at least 16 times larger than the upper limit derived here from its Hubble image on July 21, 2025. Quote:The tidal force of the Sun is expected to separate the fragments in the coming weeks, creating an appearance similar to that of the comet Shoemaker-Levi 9 in 1994 near Jupiter. I discussed this possible outcome a month ago here. Quote:Technological thrusters require a much smaller mass loss in order to produce the observed jets around 3I/ATLAS. Chemical rockets are propelled by an exhaust speed of 3–5 kilometers per second, which is ten times larger than the maximum ejection speed of volatiles sublimated by sunlight from natural cometary surfaces. Ion thrusters reach an even higher ejection speed of 10–50 kilometers per second. Alien-tech thrusters might employ yet higher exhaust speeds, reducing the required mass loss by several orders of magnitude and making the required fuel a small of the spacecraft mass. Upcoming spectroscopic observations will determine the velocity, mass flux and composition of the jets of 3I/ATLAS. If 3I/Atlas has broken up it will remain a happy memory of an interesting few months but if it hasn't the mystery remains and Atlas will surely move from a 4 to at least a 6 on the Loeb scale. RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-11-2025 Looks like a deal has been agreed to end the government shutdown so hopefully NASA will release the long awaited MRO data and images as soon as the ink is dry. "The main threat to new knowledge is the arrogance of expertise." Avi Loeb. RE: Interstellar visitor - Ninurta - 11-12-2025 (11-11-2025, 05:16 PM)gortex Wrote: Looks like a deal has been agreed to end the government shutdown so hopefully NASA will release the long awaited MRO data and images as soon as the ink is dry. i wouldn't hold my breath. They've probably got a Special Study Group working feverishly around the clock to come up with another excuse now that they can no longer use that one. . RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-12-2025 Observation on the jets coming from 3I/Atlas post perihelium and silence over the long awaited MRO images. Quote:The series of collimated jets in post-perihelion images of 3I/ATLAS extend out to a million kilometers towards the Sun and 3 million kilometers away from the Sun. They could be generated by sunlight heating pockets of ice on the surface of a natural object for about a month or by thrusters on the surface of a spacecraft. In the first case, the jet speed should be at most a few hundred meters per second whereas in the second case, it should be at least a few kilometers per second. Spectroscopic measurements of molecular or atomic lines can easily distinguish between these scenarios by measuring the Doppler velocity of these jets in the coming weeks. Science is fun because it allows us to choose the correct interpretation based on the humility to learn from evidence rather than from the arrogance of expertise. Image of Atlas as seen yesterday courtesy of the Virtual Telescope Project. ![]() I wonder if Atlas has broken up perhaps it separated its constituent parts ready for the next stage , the lack of communication from NASA is because of the government shutdown they can't hold a press conference and they need a press conference for ..... Disclosure !!!!! Probably not but these are strange times. RE: Interstellar visitor - Kenzo1 - 11-12-2025 (11-12-2025, 05:05 PM)gortex Wrote: Observation on the jets coming from 3I/Atlas post perihelium and silence over the long awaited MRO images. NASA is strange on this photo issue yes . RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-13-2025 Atlas didn't break up and is still in one piece according to latest observations. Quote:Images taken of 3I/ATLAS on November 11, 2025 show a single body, with no evidence for breakup following the perihelion passage two weeks earlier. The images, reported here, were taken by David Jewitt and Jane Luu on the Nordic Optical Telescope with a primary mirror of 2.56-meter diameter, located at La Palma in the Canary Islands Quote:Given the large-scale jets reported recently, the fact that 3I/ATLAS remains a single body is surprising for a natural comet. In particular, the large-scale image of 3I/ATLAS reported here on November 9, 2029 shows jets reaching out to ~1 million kilometers towards the Sun and ~3 million kilometers in the opposite direction, as discussed here. For a natural comet, the outflow velocity of the jets is expected to be 0.4 kilometers per second, of order the sound speed of gas at the distance of 3I/ATLAS from the Sun. At that speed, the jets must have persisted over a timescale of 1–3 months.
RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-14-2025 A new image of Atlas seems to suggest the object is now 3 objects. ![]() ![]() Quote:Thanks to the good weather, we managed to image comet C/2025 K1 ATLAS again, finding a dramatic situation in the inner coma, after the recent outburst and fragmentation, with several pieces/clouds visible. We also provide an animation showing the evolution in two days. Separation complete , I wonder which one is coming to Earth.
RE: Interstellar visitor - Kenzo1 - 11-15-2025 (11-14-2025, 10:20 PM)gortex Wrote: A new image of Atlas seems to suggest the object is now 3 objects. Nasa is going to release the images soon ....( after they photoshopped it ) RE: Interstellar visitor - F2d5thCav - 11-15-2025 3I/Atlas: "Missile away!"
RE: Interstellar visitor - gortex - 11-15-2025 The 12 anomalies of 3I/Atlas that have made it such a curiosity. Quote:1. Its retrograde trajectory is aligned to within 5 degrees with the ecliptic plane of the planets around the Sun, with a likelihood of 0.2% (see here). RE: Interstellar visitor - Ninurta - 11-15-2025 A paper defining the "Loeb Scale" can be found here . I've not read the whole thing yet, but the first thing that strikes me is right up front - why is the lead investigator listed at the top of the paper (Omer Eldadi) from an Israeli school of PSYCHOLOGY? What does psychology have to do with astronomy... unless... there is a psychological operation in play? I think I am uniquely qualified to express that reservation, as I went to university for physics with a concentration in astronomy, and at the same time my first wife was going to the same university to get her PhD in psychology. I am acutely aware of the vast differences between those two "sciences". I put that in quotes because I've never considered psychology to be a science. From what I know of it, which is more than is known by the average bear (from having assisted my first wife in her studies of it), it's more of an art. It's the Art of Manipulation, for the most part. Things that make you go "hmmmm..." ETA: I also found this to be of interest: Quote:Corresponding Address: What university professor uses Gmail for his professional correspondence? Most, if not all, universities have their own email addresses, and don't rely on extrernal emails like Gmail. . |