(02-21-2026, 03:28 PM)gortex Wrote: If the Supreme court is weighted toward Republicans 6/3 how is their decision against Trump wrong ? , I could see the upset if the Dems had the majority but if Trump's tariffs are illegal isn't it a Conservative dominated court's duty to rule that way , is the rule of law no longer valid in Trump's America ?

Quote:The Gateway Pundit reposted


TMK
@themagaking

Justice Roberts: 

Obama can force every American to buy health insurance, and hit them with a “tax” if they refuse? 

YES. 

Justice Roberts: 

Biden can force federal workers to take a vaccine, even against personal beliefs, doctor advice, or religious objections? 

YES. 

Justice Roberts: 

Trump can impose reciprocal tariffs to level the playing field and help American workers? 

NO. 

Justice isn’t blind. 
For Roberts, it’s political.

Quote:



LHGrey

@grey4626
·
20h
Holy fucking hell...wake the fuck up and stare into the abyss of our captured judiciary.

Chief Justice John Roberts, that sanctimonious, black-robed traitor to impartiality, spent a full goddamn week shacked up at the opulent U.S. ambassador's palace in Prague hosted by Norm Eisen, an Obama-era official involved in Trump impeachments, framing it as a conflict of interest under 28 U.S.C. § 455 that demands recusal and impeachment.

• The post by
  @grey4626
  vehemently criticizes Chief Justice John Roberts for a 2015 stay at the U.S. ambassador's residence in Prague hosted by Norm Eisen, an Obama-era official involved in Trump impeachments, framing it as a conflict of interest under 28 U.S.C. § 455 that demands recusal and impeachment.
  
• Eisen, who served as U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic from 2011-2014, publicly acknowledged hosting Roberts for a week to discuss "rule of law initiatives," an event detailed in Eisen's 2018 memoir The Last Palace and resurfaced in 2025 amid scrutiny of judicial ethics.
  
• This old interaction has reignited conservative outrage, tying into broader narratives of "captured judiciary" and recent Supreme Court tensions over Trump-related cases, though no formal ethics violation has been established despite calls for accountability.
  

(02-21-2026, 11:43 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Get this

Quote:



LHGrey

@grey4626
·
20h
Holy fucking hell...wake the fuck up and stare into the abyss of our captured judiciary.

Chief Justice John Roberts, that sanctimonious, black-robed traitor to impartiality, spent a full goddamn week shacked up at the opulent U.S. ambassador's palace in Prague hosted by Norm Eisen, an Obama-era official involved in Trump impeachments, framing it as a conflict of interest under 28 U.S.C. § 455 that demands recusal and impeachment.

• The post by
  @grey4626
  vehemently criticizes Chief Justice John Roberts for a 2015 stay at the U.S. ambassador's residence in Prague hosted by Norm Eisen, an Obama-era official involved in Trump impeachments, framing it as a conflict of interest under 28 U.S.C. § 455 that demands recusal and impeachment.
  
• Eisen, who served as U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic from 2011-2014, publicly acknowledged hosting Roberts for a week to discuss "rule of law initiatives," an event detailed in Eisen's 2018 memoir The Last Palace and resurfaced in 2025 amid scrutiny of judicial ethics.
  
• This old interaction has reignited conservative outrage, tying into broader narratives of "captured judiciary" and recent Supreme Court tensions over Trump-related cases, though no formal ethics violation has been established despite calls for accountability.
  

(02-22-2026, 09:46 AM)727Sky Wrote: Existing laws will allow Trump to precede with tariffs just under a different set of regulations.   

(02-22-2026, 02:23 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(02-21-2026, 11:43 PM)putnam6 Wrote: Get this

Quote:

• The post by
  @grey4626
  vehemently criticizes Chief Justice John Roberts for a 2015 stay at the U.S. ambassador's residence in Prague hosted by Norm Eisen, an Obama-era official involved in Trump impeachments, framing it as a conflict of interest under 28 U.S.C. § 455 that demands recusal and impeachment.
  
• Eisen, who served as U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic from 2011-2014, publicly acknowledged hosting Roberts for a week to discuss "rule of law initiatives," an event detailed in Eisen's 2018 memoir The Last Palace and resurfaced in 2025 amid scrutiny of judicial ethics.
  
• This old interaction has reignited conservative outrage, tying into broader narratives of "captured judiciary" and recent Supreme Court tensions over Trump-related cases, though no formal ethics violation has been established despite calls for accountability.
  

The Gateway Pundit reposted


TMK
@themagaking

Justice Roberts: 

Obama can force every American to buy health insurance, and hit them with a “tax” if they refuse? 

YES. 

Justice Roberts: 

Biden can force federal workers to take a vaccine, even against personal beliefs, doctor advice, or religious objections? 

YES. 

Justice Roberts: 

Trump can impose reciprocal tariffs to level the playing field and help American workers? 

NO. 

Justice isn’t blind. 
For Roberts, it’s political.

What are saying? You see that you see the truth?