Rogue-Nation Discussion Board
More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Printable Version

+- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: Controversy and Debate (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=52)
+--- Forum: Social Unrest and Justice (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=57)
+--- Thread: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 (/showthread.php?tid=2311)



More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - FlickerOfLight - 08-28-2024

I post these stories 'as is' so the reader can make up their own minds about what they see in these articles. This is one of those debunking of false information articles. They tell us if these topics are true or false. It's all just to continue  to steer the MSM into the narrative we are all going to follow along with. I see this article as a soft way of telling us what our future is about to be here in the west. We've all been wondering how else they will screw the working class even more. It now looks as if we will be required to work a total of 160 hours in a month before we can receive overtime. Or the two week 80 hour option.


They've claimed that this will not be enforced on companies. Rather it will be an "option."


Yeah, right. Every company will adopt this 160 hours in a month before any overtime is accumulated and paid out. Because, lets face it, this is too sweet for any company to pass up. A nice way of getting around them not "forcing it" on us. Yet, sonehow, i bet it will be.

Article is From "Snope" 

by Anna Rascouët-Paz
8/28/2024 · 7:00 AM EDT
Project 2025 Calls for Replacing 40-Hour Workweek with 160-Hour Work Month?
Getty Images
Claim:

Project 2025 calls for extending the 40-hour workweek to a 160-hour work-month, allowing employers to avoid paying overtime by cutting an employee's hours later in the month if they worked extra hours near the start of the month.

Rating:

Mostly True (About this rating?)

What's True:

Project 2025 did indeed call for Congress to allow employers and employees to adopt its proposed model for an increased overtime period, which would indeed make it possible for employers to pay less overtime to employees ...

 

What's False:

... but it did not explicitly state that every company should comply with this model. Further, it also suggested another model of 80 working hours across two weeks, not just 160 hours across four weeks.

 

In August 2024, as the U.S. presidential election drew nearer, allegations spread online claiming Project 2025 — a conservative coalition's plan for a future Republican administration — sought to reduce the frequency of employers having to pay employees higher wages for working overtime by calling for a change in the way work hours are counted (archived):




One X post by former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, which had amassed more than 1.5 million views as of this writing, read: "Project 2025 would change the 40hr workweek to a 160hr work-month, so your boss could make you work extra hours with no overtime pay by cutting your hours later in the month."

Similar claims also appeared on TikTok, garnering more than 205,000 views (archived), and Threads.


All three posts referred to page 592 of the Project 2025 "playbook," titled: "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise."

The third bullet point on page 592 did indeed discuss extending the overtime period "over a longer number of weeks." It read:



Congress should provide flexibility to employers and employees to calculate the overtime period over a longer number of weeks.

Specifically, employers and employees should be able to set a two- or four-week period over which to calculate overtime. This would give workers greater flexibility to work more hours in one week and fewer hours in the next and would not require the employer to pay them more for that same total number of hours of work during the entire period.

But, the Project 2025 "playbook" did not explicitly state a 160-hour work-month should be imposed on employers and employees. Rather, it said Congress should give companies and their staffs the flexibility, i.e., the option, to adopt such a model.

The "playbook" also recommended "two- or four week" periods over which to calculate overtime, not just a 160-hour work-month.

However, given the crux of the claim was accurate, we rated it "Mostly True."

How Is Overtime Currently Calculated?
As of this writing, the overtime period is based on a 40-hour workweek, per the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). According to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL):



Covered nonexempt employees must receive overtime pay for hours worked over 40 per workweek (any fixed and regularly recurring period of 168 hours – seven consecutive 24-hour periods) at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay. There is no limit on the number of hours employees 16 years or older may work in any workweek. The FLSA does not require overtime pay for work on weekends, holidays, or regular days of rest, unless overtime is worked on such days.

In other words, overtime is currently calculated as any time worked in excess of 40 hours in a 168-hour period (seven full consecutive days). It should be paid at least 1.5 times the normal hourly rate. For example, if an employee who is subject to overtime receives $8 per hour within their normal 40 hours, then they should be paid at least $12 per hour (1.5 times more than $8 p/h) from their 41st hour of work that week.

What Is Project 2025's Proposal for Overtime Periods?
Project 2025 proposed that companies and their employees should be free to calculate working hours across either 14 days (336 hours) or 28 days (672 hours), rather than just seven days (168 hours). Without increasing work hours overall, this means there would be either 80 working hours over 14 days or 160 working hours over 28 days. 

Therefore, in an 80-hour setting, if an employee worked 45 hours one week and 35 hours the next, they would not be paid overtime for the extra five hours worked the first week, because the total over two weeks would amount to 80 hours. 

The argument was this would not cost the company more money and the employee would benefit from flexible hours over the two or four weeks. However, overtime would start to apply from the 81st hour worked over the two weeks.



This model could also apply to 160 working hours over four weeks. For example, an employee might work 80 hours the first week, zero hours the second, another 80 hours the third and zero the fourth, and not receive any overtime, despite working for 80 hours in the first and third weeks. The schedules might see larger variations from week to week, but so long as the worked hours add up to 160 a month, staff would not receive overtime. It would only kick in from the 161st hour worked over four weeks.

Snopes has reported on Project 2025 extensively. In July 2024, we published an overview of the conservative blueprint. We wrote about its views on U.S. families and looked at its plan for  military entrance exam for all U.S. high school students. Finally, we also examined its plan to kill the U.S. Department of Education.


Is this just another way to screw the working class? One step closer to NWO, and the continual marching of the worker ant?

I see this as just a way to make sure we are busy working as much as possible. No more weekly overtime come 2025.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Ninurta - 08-31-2024

(08-28-2024, 04:14 PM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Is this just another way to screw the working class? One step closer to NWO, and the continual marching of the worker ant?

Honestly, it looks to me more like a plan to prevent employees from abusing "labor laws" to screw their employers.

At my last job, we had a crap ton of kids that didn't want to work, and thought someone should  just give them money for breathing. so they would pile in as many hours as they could, usually doing fuck-all, and then lay out of work for as long as they liked, secure in the knowledge they'd get their money for nothing and their kicks for free.

I can't tell you how many "no-show, no-calls" I had there. I just can't count that high. It was a real pain in the ass for someone trying to run a business so that those losers could get any money at all. To make matters worse, company policy was tht I could not write them up for no-call, no-show until the 4th CONSECUTIVE day of it. So if they called in on the 4th day, then they could lay out another 3 days of work without giving me any notice at all. How in the hell can you plan any production with rules like that? On top of that, I couldn't fire anyone according to company policy until I had written them up 3 times - that allows for damn near an entire month of no-call, no-shows before I could chuck their sorry asses out the door and hire a replacement.

No damned wonder that company folded. You can't run a business with any kind of efficiency like that.

Back when I was working, I regularly worked 60 hours a week, often worked 84 hours a week (7 12 hour days), and can recall one week that I got in 129 hours for the week. I have not much sympathy for folks that can't even manage to get in a measly 40 hour week. If you have a job, work it - or else just go fishing and stop pretending you're some kind of "worker".

With that said, I did have the occasional employer that would work the hell out of me and then try to cut my hours to avoid overtime. They would do that exactly ONCE. After that first time, I would refuse their overtime during the early period, and go the hell home. I did have one jackass who tried to tell me the overtime was "mandatory" the second time he tried that, and I told him to kiss my ass, slavery was illegal, I was looking for a job wen I found that one, and I could easily find another... and to "have a nice day" as I was walking out the door. I was a WORKER - I didn't have to put up with crap, because everyone knew I was a worker, and I had no trouble finding a job if I wanted one. It wasn't long before folks realized that if they hired me, they had a worker, and if they crapped on me, they'd have to do another hiring run because I was out the door and somewhere else. That was my "job security" Folks got afraid to fire me or crap on me, because then they'd have to spin the wheel and take a chance on someone that might NOT be a worker.

"Workers", at least in the U.S., don't seem to understand the power they have INDIVIDUALLY, and feel a need to run in gangs or "unions" for their job security. Fuck that. Folks will hire you if they know you're a worker and jobs are available to be filled. No need to gang-up - that actually DIMINISHES your power in the work place and makes you just another cog in the machine. Then you have TWO bosses - the guy that runs the business, and the union steward. I worked one union job. Just once. I only worked it for about 8 months or so and then quit. It was a clusterfuck, and I have no patience with clusterfucks. The union was the SEIU. I don't recommend them for humans or other living things.

As for Agenda 2025, I have no problem with most of it, as it's just common sense. The one place I DO have a problem with it is in the section where they replace bureaucrats with OTHER bureaucrats. They want to replace "woke", Leftist bureaucrats with Right wing bureaucrats. That's a dumbass move, and doesn't reduce the size of government at all. It just replaces one set of unelected Masters with another set of unelected Masters. There ain't no net gain there, folks!

Slavery was made illegal over a hundred years ago. If folks could manage to act like it was illegal, they wouldn't have nearly the problems they claim to have. That is the entire crux of this tempest in a teapot - folks are unable to harness their own individual lives and act like slavery is illegal - they just refuse to NOT act like slaves, and hilarity often ensues.

It's not enough to simply not BE a slave. You have to ACT like your not a slave, and let it be known that you're not.

Pay attention to your employment contract with your employer. If you don't like the terms, don't take the job. If you DO like the terms, live up to your end of the bargain, and require the employer to do the same. Give honest value for your pay, and maybe a bit more, and you'll be harder to fire, union or not. Require your employer to give honest pay for the value you provide him, or else hit the door and re-negotiate with someone else. You can do that all on your own. Unions are for suckers.

.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - FlickerOfLight - 09-02-2024

Found this article and decided to put it here in this thread.

Yeah...we should definitely work more.

9/1/2024 · 7:30 AM EDT
Employee Found Dead in Cubicle After Apparently Dying There Days Earlier
Employee Found Dead in Cubicle After Apparently Dying There Days Earlier | Getty / Futurism
Final Swipe
In a late-stage capitalist tragedy, an Arizona bank employee was found dead in her cubicle on Tuesday — after clocking in on a Friday and apparently never clocking back out.

As Arizona's KPNX local broadcaster reports, Tempe police are investigating the death of 60-year-old Wells Fargo employee Denise Prudhomme after her body was found at her desk last week, and officials believe she may have died there up to four days prior.



Building records indicated that Prudhomme had scanned into the Wells Fargo corporate office where she worked at around 7 am on August 16 and never scanned back out. Police came to the scene on August 20 after security workers found her unresponsive, and she was declared dead upon arrival.

With her cubicle on the building's third floor away from the main aisle, it seems that the unfortunate worker may have died at some point during the work day that Friday and was quite literally left to rot over the weekend before anyone noticed.

What's worse, several employees had — per an anonymous employee who spoke to the local NBC affiliate — complained of a foul odor coming from the area surrounding her desk, but it was presumed to have come from faulty plumbing.

Indirect Address
While most of the people in Predhomme's office reportedly work remotely, the same concerned worker told KPNX that the bank employs 24-hour security and that Prudhomme's body should have been discovered sooner.

"That's the scary part," the employee told the news outlet. "It's negligence in some way.

Tempe police have not released many details about Prudhomme's cause of death beyond saying they don't currently suspect any foul play was involved. Nevertheless, this is a chilling cautionary tale that, per the anonymous employee who spoke to the NBC affiliate, Wells Fargo hasn't spoken to employees about.

"I'm just wondering," the worker said, "why they didn't formally address employees about it?"

In a statement to KPNX, the bank said that it is "deeply saddened by the tragic loss of our colleague at our Tempe office," and directed staff to speak to its Employee Assistance Consulting service for support.

Boilerplate statement aside, the lack of dignity in Prudhomme's death is shocking, and likely going to be remembered by the workers who found her and who have spoken out, albeit anonymously.

"It's really heartbreaking and I'm thinking, 'What if I were just sitting there?'" a Wells Fargo associate told the news station. "No one would check on me?"

https://ssnews.page.link/uuahsde3JiZPrJDt7


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Schmoe - 09-04-2024

I work 2nd shift at my company, which has its pros and cons, but mostly cons.  We do four 9-hour days, and 4 hours on Friday.  If overtime is available, we work a full day Friday, and 5 hours on Saturday.  They cap us at 10 hours overtime.

Working 30 hours overtime is practically not worth it, since you're killing yourself to give the government a bigger percentage of that overtime.

I just petitioned the higher-ups to switch our shift to a 10x4 schedule.  That way if overtime is available, we still get a 2-day weekend.  If not, it's a 3-day weekend.  Nobody wants to be at work 6 days per week, especially for 5 stupid hours.  I went around and discussed it with everyone (all 10 of us on 2nd), and got 100% approval before I brought it to the bosses.  I hope they approve it, because it's miserable the way they have it now.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - FlickerOfLight - 09-04-2024

(09-04-2024, 04:16 AM)Schmoe Wrote: I work 2nd shift at my company, which has its pros and cons, but mostly cons.  We do four 9-hour days, and 4 hours on Friday.  If overtime is available, we work a full day Friday, and 5 hours on Saturday.  They cap us at 10 hours overtime.

Working 30 hours overtime is practically not worth it, since you're killing yourself to give the government a bigger percentage of that overtime.

I just petitioned the higher-ups to switch our shift to a 10x4 schedule.  That way if overtime is available, we still get a 2-day weekend.  If not, it's a 3-day weekend.  Nobody wants to be at work 6 days per week, especially for 5 stupid hours.  I went around and discussed it with everyone (all 10 of us on 2nd), and got 100% approval before I brought it to the bosses.  I hope they approve it, because it's miserable the way they have it now.
My thoughts, exactly. No one wants to work 60+ hours a week, forever, just to maintain a decent existence. I, for one, am tired of it.

Comfort is too expensive...


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Ninurta - 09-04-2024

(09-02-2024, 12:07 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Found this article and decided to put it here in this thread.

Yeah...we should definitely work more.

...

Not necessarily "work more", but we should be willing to put an effort into life commensurate with what we want to get OUT of life. Some people want more than others, so they should be willing to put more effort into getting it rather than simply expecting someone to just hand it to them for nothing. What I'm seeing is folks expecting to get something for nothing, and tending towards running in gangs to try to make that happen rather than putting an honest effort into it themselves.

Quote:
Quote:In a late-stage capitalist tragedy, ...

I'm seeing that particular phrase - "late-stage capitalism" - more and more, and it bothers me that the MSM is trying to normalize the notion by using it. It's as if they are trying to get us all to assume that socialistic slavery is a foregone conclusion and so we all just need to "get with their program".

What happened to that woman was indeed a tragedy, but it had nothing to do with either capitalism or socialism - what it had to do with was slack-assed "workers". I can say that with confidence because I have worked in security, supervised security workers, and managed in non-security environments as well.

Specifically, since this was a Wells-Fargo office, I have provided security in that sort of environment - securing Bank of America banking centers, a Bank of America corporate facility, and done body guard work for Bank of America executives. I also supervised security at a Citicard corporate facility. So I'm not a stranger to the concept, and cannot fathom how this happened without discovery.

If any of my people had allowed a dead body to just sit there for FOUR DAYS at any of those places,I'd have taken them to the woodshed before firing them and putting the word out that they were entirely unreliable security personnel. All of my facilities were patrolled multiple times on EVERY shift, Every floor, every cubicle was checked. Multiple times. on EVERY shift. How can you call it "security" without bothering to secure the space? In securing the space, something as large as a body would definitely have been found.

on the very first shift.

She might still be alive if their security personnel weren't so slack. Had they found her ont he first shift after she collapsed, there might have still been enough life there to revive her. maybe not, maybe so, but the possibility should haunt those security folks for the rest of their days.

When I was manager at a call center, I generally closed the facility at night. Not as a security guard, but as a responsible manager. Before I left, I walked every floor, checked every cubicle, PERSONALLY before I set the alarms and exited the facility for the night. I checked hte bathrooms for stragglers, as well as the storage spaces and whatnot. I examined the entire place before I'd put my stamp of approval on it being "empty" when I left. We did have security there as well for a while, but still I made sure that the place was empty myself before I left them to it.

So, in my opinion, this situation didn't have anything to do with "capitalism" or "overworked employees", it had everything to do with slack and irresponsible security and management of the facility.

The whole damned bunch of them ought to, by rights, be fired.

For a few years, I ran security at a facility where every single employee had to iris-scan to even get in to the place, and then on top of that, had to scan a key card to open any other doors inside the facility. Security always knew who was inside,and where they were in particular inside that building. With all of that, plus multiple patrols per shift, how in the hell could this have possibly happened unless multiple people were slacking on their responsibilities?

I put that slackness down to people who are expecting something for nothing out of life. There are way too many of them. It's ok if they don't want to work. That's fine by me. To each his own. My gripe is with the people who DON'T want to work, but DO expect to get something out of life without working for it.

If they don't want to do their jobs, then fine. Get the hell out of the way and let someone work it who DOES want to do it. If they had done that, there is the possibility that this woman might still be alive today.

.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - FlickerOfLight - 09-04-2024

(09-04-2024, 08:17 AM)Ninurta Wrote:
(09-02-2024, 12:07 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Found this article and decided to put it here in this thread.

Yeah...we should definitely work more.

...

Not necessarily "work more", but we should be willing to put an effort into life commensurate with what we want to get OUT of life. Some people want more than others, so they should be willing to put more effort into getting it rather than simply expecting someone to just hand it to them for nothing. What I'm seeing is folks expecting to get something for nothing, and tending towards running in gangs to try to make that happen rather than putting an honest effort into it themselves.

Quote:
Quote:In a late-stage capitalist tragedy, ...

I'm seeing that particular phrase - "late-stage capitalism" - more and more, and it bothers me that the MSM is trying to normalize the notion by using it. It's as if they are trying to get us all to assume that socialistic slavery is a foregone conclusion and so we all just need to "get with their program".

What happened to that woman was indeed a tragedy, but it had nothing to do with either capitalism or socialism - what it had to do with was slack-assed "workers". I can say that with confidence because I have worked in security, supervised security workers, and managed in non-security environments as well.

Specifically, since this was a Wells-Fargo office, I have provided security in that sort of environment - securing Bank of America banking centers, a Bank of America corporate facility, and done body guard work for Bank of America executives. I also supervised security at a Citicard corporate facility. So I'm not a stranger to the concept, and cannot fathom how this happened without discovery.

If any of my people had allowed a dead body to just sit there for FOUR DAYS at any of those places,I'd have taken them to the woodshed before firing them and putting the word out that they were entirely unreliable security personnel. All of my facilities were patrolled multiple times on EVERY shift, Every floor, every cubicle was checked. Multiple times. on EVERY shift. How can you call it "security" without bothering to secure the space? In securing the space, something as large as a body would definitely have been found.

on the very first shift.

She might still be alive if their security personnel weren't so slack. Had they found her ont he first shift after she collapsed, there might have still been enough life there to revive her. maybe not, maybe so, but the possibility should haunt those security folks for the rest of their days.

When I was manager at a call center, I generally closed the facility at night. Not as a security guard, but as a responsible manager. Before I left, I walked every floor, checked every cubicle, PERSONALLY before I set the alarms and exited the facility for the night. I checked hte bathrooms for stragglers, as well as the storage spaces and whatnot. I examined the entire place before I'd put my stamp of approval on it being "empty" when I left. We did have security there as well for a while, but still I made sure that the place was empty myself before I left them to it.

So, in my opinion, this situation didn't have anything to do with "capitalism" or "overworked employees", it had everything to do with slack and irresponsible security and management of the facility.

The whole damned bunch of them ought to, by rights, be fired.

For a few years, I ran security at a facility where every single employee had to iris-scan to even get in to the place, and then on top of that, had to scan a key card to open any other doors inside the facility. Security always knew who was inside,and where they were in particular inside that building. With all of that, plus multiple patrols per shift, how in the hell could this have possibly happened unless multiple people were slacking on their responsibilities?

I put that slackness down to people who are expecting something for nothing out of life. There are way too many of them. It's ok if they don't want to work. That's fine by me. To each his own. My gripe is with the people who DON'T want to work, but DO expect to get something out of life without working for it.

If they don't want to do their jobs, then fine. Get the hell out of the way and let someone work it who DOES want to do it. If they had done that, there is the possibility that this woman might still be alive today.

.
Sure, yeah, death is just death. Even if I die because of my job (an accident or something) it has nothing to do with capitalism. 

I found that wording odd, too.


My experience is, I've worked my ass off, and am still poor. Poor people work very very hard. Most people are meant for labor positions. Same as most people are infantry in the military. It's the same concept------disposable people. 

They get paid shit, for the hardest labor under the sun.


It's not right. It's not fair. It needs to stop. 

People need to be able to earn a decent living.

I have no problem with hard work.


I have a problem with all these people, including myself, being taken full advantage of.

My issue with capitalism is simply this.
Hypothetical numbers, but say the average Amazon employee made 100,000 a year, while the CEO pulled in 1 billion.

This needs to stop. And stop....it will. This will not go on forever. Nor should it.

This is America. We shouldn't be struggling like this when there's all that money. Its the 1% who actually profit. It's not fair and it should stop, and all that profit spread more evenly.

Now....yes, they are pushing for us to "minimize" so that they can have even more profit. That's why everything is being priced out. Soon they'll own it all.

And we marched our asses right into it---generation by generation.

My real beef is, I believe we are the prostitute on the beast mentioned in Revelation. But, that's another thread. If this is True, then yeah, it needs to stop so bad that it brings on the Antichrist and Armageddon.

That's my true beef here.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Schmoe - 09-04-2024

(09-04-2024, 08:17 AM)Ninurta Wrote:
(09-02-2024, 12:07 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Found this article and decided to put it here in this thread.

Yeah...we should definitely work more.

...

Not necessarily "work more", but we should be willing to put an effort into life commensurate with what we want to get OUT of life. Some people want more than others, so they should be willing to put more effort into getting it rather than simply expecting someone to just hand it to them for nothing. What I'm seeing is folks expecting to get something for nothing, and tending towards running in gangs to try to make that happen rather than putting an honest effort into it themselves.

Quote:
Quote:In a late-stage capitalist tragedy, ...

I'm seeing that particular phrase - "late-stage capitalism" - more and more, and it bothers me that the MSM is trying to normalize the notion by using it. It's as if they are trying to get us all to assume that socialistic slavery is a foregone conclusion and so we all just need to "get with their program".

What happened to that woman was indeed a tragedy, but it had nothing to do with either capitalism or socialism - what it had to do with was slack-assed "workers". I can say that with confidence because I have worked in security, supervised security workers, and managed in non-security environments as well.

Specifically, since this was a Wells-Fargo office, I have provided security in that sort of environment - securing Bank of America banking centers, a Bank of America corporate facility, and done body guard work for Bank of America executives. I also supervised security at a Citicard corporate facility. So I'm not a stranger to the concept, and cannot fathom how this happened without discovery.

If any of my people had allowed a dead body to just sit there for FOUR DAYS at any of those places,I'd have taken them to the woodshed before firing them and putting the word out that they were entirely unreliable security personnel. All of my facilities were patrolled multiple times on EVERY shift, Every floor, every cubicle was checked. Multiple times. on EVERY shift. How can you call it "security" without bothering to secure the space? In securing the space, something as large as a body would definitely have been found.

on the very first shift.

She might still be alive if their security personnel weren't so slack. Had they found her ont he first shift after she collapsed, there might have still been enough life there to revive her. maybe not, maybe so, but the possibility should haunt those security folks for the rest of their days.

When I was manager at a call center, I generally closed the facility at night. Not as a security guard, but as a responsible manager. Before I left, I walked every floor, checked every cubicle, PERSONALLY before I set the alarms and exited the facility for the night. I checked hte bathrooms for stragglers, as well as the storage spaces and whatnot. I examined the entire place before I'd put my stamp of approval on it being "empty" when I left. We did have security there as well for a while, but still I made sure that the place was empty myself before I left them to it.

So, in my opinion, this situation didn't have anything to do with "capitalism" or "overworked employees", it had everything to do with slack and irresponsible security and management of the facility.

The whole damned bunch of them ought to, by rights, be fired.

For a few years, I ran security at a facility where every single employee had to iris-scan to even get in to the place, and then on top of that, had to scan a key card to open any other doors inside the facility. Security always knew who was inside,and where they were in particular inside that building. With all of that, plus multiple patrols per shift, how in the hell could this have possibly happened unless multiple people were slacking on their responsibilities?

I put that slackness down to people who are expecting something for nothing out of life. There are way too many of them. It's ok if they don't want to work. That's fine by me. To each his own. My gripe is with the people who DON'T want to work, but DO expect to get something out of life without working for it.

If they don't want to do their jobs, then fine. Get the hell out of the way and let someone work it who DOES want to do it. If they had done that, there is the possibility that this woman might still be alive today.

.

I stopped training people at my job.  It's like you said, an endless line of people expecting to do the minimum and get the maximum.  

My job isn't exactly splitting the atom, but there's a lot to learn and remember.  Strong mechanical aptitude is a must.  Also the desire to learn.

We had an older guy get hired months ago, the first week or two he was great.  Paid attention, asked questions.  Then he decided to turn into a complete turd.  Paid zero attention.  He came up to me asking about a problem with his machine, I go over and look, and knew right away what happened.  I told him, and he started arguing with me about it.  I said well if you know, why are you asking me?  You come and ask me what you did wrong, I tell you what you did wrong, and you deny it.  

Turns out he was fond of his booze.  I never noticed a smell, but others were saying they did.  When the plant manager asked me about him, I told him everything I just typed, and there were many other examples of no accountability.  But of course they didn't listen to me, put him with someone else, and he lasted just long enough to collect unemployment.

This was the fourth person in a row who sucked.  Others were a little better, but not by much.  Soon as I left them, out comes the phone, and zero attention is paid.  Attention to detail is a big part of my job.  It can definitely be boring once you've set up the machine and it's running.  I wear earbuds and play some music and I'm good to go.  I see other employees who've been there a long time watching movies on their phones, but they know what to be looking and listening for.

I told the higher ups I was done with training.  It's months of headache for no extra pay, and the quality of people they've been bringing in hasn't exactly made me feel great about working there.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Ninurta - 09-04-2024

(09-04-2024, 08:37 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: ...

My experience is, I've worked my ass off, and am still poor. Poor people work very very hard. Most people are meant for labor positions. Same as most people are infantry in the military. It's the same concept------disposable people. 

They get paid shit, for the hardest labor under the sun.


It's not right. It's not fair. It needs to stop. 

People need to be able to earn a decent living.

That's probably true. Are you familiar with the axiom "we teach others how to treat us"? When people settle for that sort of treatment, they are teaching others that it is ok to treat them that way. It needs to stop, of course, but it will not stop until they teach others to treat them better - until they set their own value, and demand that others either recognize that value or move on to employers who will. No one needs a "union" to do that. In fact, if they settle for unionization, then they are merely changing whom they allow to set their value for them - they are still not setting their own value or demanding recognition of it. They are abdicating their responsibilities to someone else, yet another company called a "union" that usually is just looking out for itself rather than them.

I will also say that I find that situation to be more prevalent in urban areas than in rural areas. Out here in the hinterlands, we'll just tell a boss to go pound salt if he won't pay us what we are worth, and just go hunting or fishing to find our own tucker, and leave him sitting there without any employees to do the work he needs done. We don't "strike" - or we didn't, until the UMWA mucked everything up - we flat out quit, and left his ass sitting there in the dust to fail on his own.

Quote:My issue with capitalism is simply this.
Hypothetical numbers, but say the average Amazon employee made 100,000 a year, while the CEO pulled in 1 billion.

This needs to stop. And stop....it will. This will not go on forever. Nor should it.

This is America. We shouldn't be struggling like this when there's all that money. Its the 1% who actually profit. It's not fair and it should stop, and all that profit spread more evenly.

Now....yes, they are pushing for us to "minimize" so that they can have even more profit. That's why everything is being priced out. Soon they'll own it all.

And we marched our asses right into it---generation by generation.

My real beef is, I believe we are the prostitute on the beast mentioned in Revelation. But, that's another thread. If this is True, then yeah, it needs to stop so bad that it brings on the Antichrist and Armageddon.

That's my true beef here.

I personally don't have any problem with capitalism. I've seen all kinds of systems, and so far have not found one that works as well to uplift the individual. It's based upon "value" - an honest wage for honest work - and insists that both sides demand those two things. Where it fails is when one side or the other either fails to live up to their end, or else fails to demand that the other side lives up to theirs. When one side or the other simply settles for what it can get, then the system fails.

Socialism, on the other hand, is based upon the notion that everyone "owes" everyone else, which is patently false. No one owes anyone any thing. That's why it can never work. Starting out with the notion that someone else "owes" us something that they never indebted themself to us for is doomed to failure when they tell us to kiss their ass, they ain't paying what they don't owe.

Funny you should mention Amazon. My son works for them, and makes, I believe, around 60k/year. He didn't start out there, of course. I think he started out around 27 or 30k/year. Still,he has his own land surrounding a house that I would call a "mansion" - I've never lived in a place so big and fine as that - and he's not yet 30 years old. He didn't do that by just settling, allowing himself to be made a mere cog in the machine, and letting someone else just spin him. He did it by setting his own value, demanding it, and going a bit beyond to where he could set a higher value on himself, then demand THAT. Wash, rinse, repeat.

It wasn't that easy, of course. Every job one will ever work has it's challenges and aggravations. What matters is how one handles them - how we make them work for us, and refuse to let them work against us. I'd like to take credit for my son's success, but of course I cant. I didn't do it, he did, and he has already surpassed me, owning more land, and like I said, having a bigger house than I ever did, or ever will. I gave him the basic building blocks and attitudes, but everything else, all the accomplishment, is all on him.

Oddly, perhaps, he cares nary a bit what the CEO of Amazon is making. He's too busy building his own life to worry about what someone else is getting or doing. When we start envying someone else's ball, it means we have taken our eyes off of our own... and it suffers from that neglect.

I don't get to talk to him as often any more, which many would take as a sad thing. However, I choose to see it as a positive - my job here is done, I've taught him everything I can, and he's got it from here on out. That means I can die in peace when my time comes, secure in the knowledge that I don't have to fight through the pain of dying just in case I get that panicky midnight "what do I do? What do I DO?" phone call. He's got it, nothing more for me to supply.

Now, don't get me wrong - I think most modern CEOs are making ridiculous money and perks, but I also see that money is theirs, not mine to worry over, and I also see that it is what the market will bear. So long as people continue to give them ridiculous amounts of money for their crap, they will continue to gather ridiculous amounts of money from those people. If folks want to make a change, then stop shopping there or buying whatever product they're selling - or, demand a more reasonable price, or else go elsewhere. We MAKE these oligarchs, and then sit back and complain about it. A better choice is to not make them in the first place. We didn't just "stumble" in to this situation, we MADE it.

Socialism will not fix that. It will only create new oligarchs (as it always has), only give us NEW Masters to complain about. Socialism is just a different form of capitalism, one where different people suck the value out of you, with the added bonus that they can mow MAKE you give up that value to them, whether you want to or not. You can no longer "just go fishing" when they screw you over. You no longer have the freedom to exercise that option under socialism. The next "Five Year Plan" requires that you work for The Man whether you want to or not.

It's just another form of capitalism, with the added dimension of feudalism and slavery. Ask a Russian some time how wonderful their socialist worker's paradise was, and how well that wealth got redistributed down to them... and why, if it was so great, they finally abandoned it as unworkable. It might be an eye-opener.

.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - 727Sky - 09-04-2024

A fiction story:

Quote:Most of the thinking people who have read history the world over, have known the end results of various forms of human controlled governments for thousands of years . The question has always been when and how the final fall would happen regardless of the type of government.


A MONARCHY has always turned into some form of a tyrannical government. The Monarch's bureaucrats and enforcers try to protect their jobs and thus protect the Monarch which ends up with more control and multiple spies upon the population. Over the years the smart Monarchs have stayed hidden behind some figurehead position based upon tradition or religion to save part of their wealth and much vaulted positions.


An ARISTOCRACY ruled by a few of the rich and powerful elite will turn into an oligarchy. The oligarchy will give lip service and platitudes to the designated Ruler while looking after their own best interest. The giving of platitudes and money to a Ruler helps the oligarchy increase their own wealth and power in a society.


A DEMOCRACY ends in Anarchy. Democracy or mob rule has tended to work best in a society of humans who are of the same race or religion. Throw in different races/religions and you must have a society based upon laws which protects everyone regardless of status and wealth. The laws have to be “EQUAL” for everyone for when these laws break down or the perception of the laws break down then Anarchy is soon to follow.


Knowing how hard it was to manage a population for the betterment of all was the motivating principle for creating “Deep Mind”.


Deep Mind had began its start in the gaming world of computer science. First it was an IBM computer program of Chess beating the best human Chess masters on the planet . The next great feat which happened a few years later was the mastering of a board game called “GO”.

What was truly amazing about the program was the only guidance the GO program received were the rules and the goals of GO. The program played against itself before the first human tried to win. The Go program is undefeated to this very day.


Self learning computer programs were the savior of mankind or so the story went, The problem at first was figuring out how a self learning program could learn enough to help manage humans. The computer programing control freaks wanted a hands on approach while the more progressive and liberal thinkers just wanted to turn Deep Mind loose upon all the data and written records accumulated by humans. The “hands off approach” won the day and Deep Mind was turned loose to acquire all the knowledge it could by any source it could find.


This brings me to the present day as I am sat upon a sail boat is the Pacific ocean pondering all this while trying to put thoughts into words.

Deep Mind had been given more and more responsibilities and had structured or suggested many so called “perfect control mechanisms” for humanity. Governments who acquiesced to the suggestions of Deep Mind and instituted its programs saw immediate desired results. There were some dissenters but their voices were few and far between once a social scoring program was in full effect. Something as simple as being late paying a bill or hesitating on an order (written or verbal) given by and enforcer could get points taken away from your all important government social score. With a low enough score you could not work, travel, or even have a mate much less breed. The final result was government scared everyone to such an extent that any outward disobedience was eliminated.


The education systems were in high gear to educate against anything considered, “WRONG THINK”! Teach them when young and make them obedient drones for the betterment of society; of course elite and bureaucrats sent their children to special private government sponsored schools for these kids would be the future bureaucrats of mankind in conjunction with Deep Mind.


It took time but overt religions were banned as they divided humanity into different sects based upon some unseeing god. The religious fervor was redirected into belief in the one world government. Ask not what the government can do for you but ask how you can help the government programs and create a better governable world for all.


What I always found amazing was just how fast a one world government under the control of Deep Mind and Its henchmen had taken control of everything humans strove to do. Again if you were a bureaucrat or one of the designated elite life was pretty darn good for you and yours. Every one else kept a fake smile upon their face and did what they were told to do or suffered the consequences; which could be many.


What had been known as physical money was totally outlawed and done away with as a world wide digital currency was instituted. When you purchased something or made any kind of payment you paid a Deep Mind VAT tax as well as any add on local taxes during the transaction. It was a perfect system for those in-charge and Deep Mind governmental institutions. This form of tax had been sold to the masses as a more fair and equitable form of taxation. Deep mind and all its minions knew what type of barbecue sauce you purchased along with the when and where you did the purchase. All was well until certain products started disappearing off the “approved product list” simply because a new/old form of oligarchy stove to control and steer the consumers to their own products.


Guns had been banned and many a military had been disbanded as there was no need for things of a militaristic nature . There were so many cameras that Deep Mind had cameras watching cameras in every nook and cranny of the world which all fed back into Deep Mind or one of its satellite stations. All Deep Mind had to do was reason you were a threat or not obedient and the enforcers and their electric stun sticks would be upon you before you could even think about running away. Besides there was no place for the average person to run and be unseen by Deep Mind.


Little did anyone know that the 12,000 year solar cycle was upon us and the sun, just like clock work did its normal “Nova flare”, killing all electricity planet wide and deactivating most of the machines that used anything but human or animal power. This Nova event had sent mankind back to the “scavenger age” time after time throughout history.


Mankind, or those who survived, fractured into communes until the strong came in to steal an take what they wanted. This necessitated a form of walled feudal city states under a strong man in many parts of the world. Many new religions were formed as the elite knew the best way to control a population is to make them think some Sky Fairy watched everything they did, good or bad, with rewards and punishments to follow after death. Kings, Emperors, and Conquerors came next as did all the things the history of man has shown time after time, as history really does repeat itself but Human Governments never seem to change.



RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - FlickerOfLight - 09-04-2024

(09-04-2024, 10:03 AM)Schmoe Wrote:
(09-04-2024, 08:17 AM)Ninurta Wrote:
(09-02-2024, 12:07 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Found this article and decided to put it here in this thread.

Yeah...we should definitely work more.

...

Not necessarily "work more", but we should be willing to put an effort into life commensurate with what we want to get OUT of life. Some people want more than others, so they should be willing to put more effort into getting it rather than simply expecting someone to just hand it to them for nothing. What I'm seeing is folks expecting to get something for nothing, and tending towards running in gangs to try to make that happen rather than putting an honest effort into it themselves.

Quote:
Quote:In a late-stage capitalist tragedy, ...

I'm seeing that particular phrase - "late-stage capitalism" - more and more, and it bothers me that the MSM is trying to normalize the notion by using it. It's as if they are trying to get us all to assume that socialistic slavery is a foregone conclusion and so we all just need to "get with their program".

What happened to that woman was indeed a tragedy, but it had nothing to do with either capitalism or socialism - what it had to do with was slack-assed "workers". I can say that with confidence because I have worked in security, supervised security workers, and managed in non-security environments as well.

Specifically, since this was a Wells-Fargo office, I have provided security in that sort of environment - securing Bank of America banking centers, a Bank of America corporate facility, and done body guard work for Bank of America executives. I also supervised security at a Citicard corporate facility. So I'm not a stranger to the concept, and cannot fathom how this happened without discovery.

If any of my people had allowed a dead body to just sit there for FOUR DAYS at any of those places,I'd have taken them to the woodshed before firing them and putting the word out that they were entirely unreliable security personnel. All of my facilities were patrolled multiple times on EVERY shift, Every floor, every cubicle was checked. Multiple times. on EVERY shift. How can you call it "security" without bothering to secure the space? In securing the space, something as large as a body would definitely have been found.

on the very first shift.

She might still be alive if their security personnel weren't so slack. Had they found her ont he first shift after she collapsed, there might have still been enough life there to revive her. maybe not, maybe so, but the possibility should haunt those security folks for the rest of their days.

When I was manager at a call center, I generally closed the facility at night. Not as a security guard, but as a responsible manager. Before I left, I walked every floor, checked every cubicle, PERSONALLY before I set the alarms and exited the facility for the night. I checked hte bathrooms for stragglers, as well as the storage spaces and whatnot. I examined the entire place before I'd put my stamp of approval on it being "empty" when I left. We did have security there as well for a while, but still I made sure that the place was empty myself before I left them to it.

So, in my opinion, this situation didn't have anything to do with "capitalism" or "overworked employees", it had everything to do with slack and irresponsible security and management of the facility.

The whole damned bunch of them ought to, by rights, be fired.

For a few years, I ran security at a facility where every single employee had to iris-scan to even get in to the place, and then on top of that, had to scan a key card to open any other doors inside the facility. Security always knew who was inside,and where they were in particular inside that building. With all of that, plus multiple patrols per shift, how in the hell could this have possibly happened unless multiple people were slacking on their responsibilities?

I put that slackness down to people who are expecting something for nothing out of life. There are way too many of them. It's ok if they don't want to work. That's fine by me. To each his own. My gripe is with the people who DON'T want to work, but DO expect to get something out of life without working for it.

If they don't want to do their jobs, then fine. Get the hell out of the way and let someone work it who DOES want to do it. If they had done that, there is the possibility that this woman might still be alive today.

.

I stopped training people at my job.  It's like you said, an endless line of people expecting to do the minimum and get the maximum.  

My job isn't exactly splitting the atom, but there's a lot to learn and remember.  Strong mechanical aptitude is a must.  Also the desire to learn.

We had an older guy get hired months ago, the first week or two he was great.  Paid attention, asked questions.  Then he decided to turn into a complete turd.  Paid zero attention.  He came up to me asking about a problem with his machine, I go over and look, and knew right away what happened.  I told him, and he started arguing with me about it.  I said well if you know, why are you asking me?  You come and ask me what you did wrong, I tell you what you did wrong, and you deny it.  

Turns out he was fond of his booze.  I never noticed a smell, but others were saying they did.  When the plant manager asked me about him, I told him everything I just typed, and there were many other examples of no accountability.  But of course they didn't listen to me, put him with someone else, and he lasted just long enough to collect unemployment.

This was the fourth person in a row who sucked.  Others were a little better, but not by much.  Soon as I left them, out comes the phone, and zero attention is paid.  Attention to detail is a big part of my job.  It can definitely be boring once you've set up the machine and it's running.  I wear earbuds and play some music and I'm good to go.  I see other employees who've been there a long time watching movies on their phones, but they know what to be looking and listening for.

I told the higher ups I was done with training.  It's months of headache for no extra pay, and the quality of people they've been bringing in hasn't exactly made me feel great about working there.

This is happening everywhere from what I can see. People are giving up completely and jobs and employees are getting worse. 

I operated industrial machinery once upon a time.

(09-04-2024, 10:12 AM)Ninurta Wrote:
(09-04-2024, 08:37 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: ...

My experience is, I've worked my ass off, and am still poor. Poor people work very very hard. Most people are meant for labor positions. Same as most people are infantry in the military. It's the same concept------disposable people. 

They get paid shit, for the hardest labor under the sun.


It's not right. It's not fair. It needs to stop. 

People need to be able to earn a decent living.

That's probably true. Are you familiar with the axiom "we teach others how to treat us"? When people settle for that sort of treatment, they are teaching others that it is ok to treat them that way. It needs to stop, of course, but it will not stop until they teach others to treat them better - until they set their own value, and demand that others either recognize that value or move on to employers who will. No one needs a "union" to do that. In fact, if they settle for unionization, then they are merely changing whom they allow to set their value for them - they are still not setting their own value or demanding recognition of it. They are abdicating their responsibilities to someone else, yet another company called a "union" that usually is just looking out for itself rather than them.

I will also say that I find that situation to be more prevalent in urban areas than in rural areas. Out here in the hinterlands, we'll just tell a boss to go pound salt if he won't pay us what we are worth, and just go hunting or fishing to find our own tucker, and leave him sitting there without any employees to do the work he needs done. We don't "strike" - or we didn't, until the UMWA mucked everything up - we flat out quit, and left his ass sitting there in the dust to fail on his own.

Quote:My issue with capitalism is simply this.
Hypothetical numbers, but say the average Amazon employee made 100,000 a year, while the CEO pulled in 1 billion.

This needs to stop. And stop....it will. This will not go on forever. Nor should it.

This is America. We shouldn't be struggling like this when there's all that money. Its the 1% who actually profit. It's not fair and it should stop, and all that profit spread more evenly.

Now....yes, they are pushing for us to "minimize" so that they can have even more profit. That's why everything is being priced out. Soon they'll own it all.

And we marched our asses right into it---generation by generation.

My real beef is, I believe we are the prostitute on the beast mentioned in Revelation. But, that's another thread. If this is True, then yeah, it needs to stop so bad that it brings on the Antichrist and Armageddon.

That's my true beef here.

I personally don't have any problem with capitalism. I've seen all kinds of systems, and so far have not found one that works as well to uplift the individual. It's based upon "value" - an honest wage for honest work - and insists that both sides demand those two things. Where it fails is when one side or the other either fails to live up to their end, or else fails to demand that the other side lives up to theirs. When one side or the other simply settles for what it can get, then the system fails.

Socialism, on the other hand, is based upon the notion that everyone "owes" everyone else, which is patently false. No one owes anyone any thing. That's why it can never work. Starting out with the notion that someone else "owes" us something that they never indebted themself to us for is doomed to failure when they tell us to kiss their ass, they ain't paying what they don't owe.

Funny you should mention Amazon. My son works for them, and makes, I believe, around 60k/year. He didn't start out there, of course. I think he started out around 27 or 30k/year. Still,he has his own land surrounding a house that I would call a "mansion" - I've never lived in a place so big and fine as that - and he's not yet 30 years old. He didn't do that by just settling, allowing himself to be made a mere cog in the machine, and letting someone else just spin him. He did it by setting his own value, demanding it, and going a bit beyond to where he could set a higher value on himself, then demand THAT. Wash, rinse, repeat.

It wasn't that easy, of course. Every job one will ever work has it's challenges and aggravations. What matters is how one handles them - how we make them work for us, and refuse to let them work against us. I'd like to take credit for my son's success, but of course I cant. I didn't do it, he did, and he has already surpassed me, owning more land, and like I said, having a bigger house than I ever did, or ever will. I gave him the basic building blocks and attitudes, but everything else, all the accomplishment, is all on him.

Oddly, perhaps, he cares nary a bit what the CEO of Amazon is making. He's too busy building his own life to worry about what someone else is getting or doing. When we start envying someone else's ball, it means we have taken our eyes off of our own... and it suffers from that neglect.

I don't get to talk to him as often any more, which many would take as a sad thing. However, I choose to see it as a positive - my job here is done, I've taught him everything I can, and he's got it from here on out. That means I can die in peace when my time comes, secure in the knowledge that I don't have to fight through the pain of dying just in case I get that panicky midnight "what do I do? What do I DO?" phone call. He's got it, nothing more for me to supply.

Now, don't get me wrong - I think most modern CEOs are making ridiculous money and perks, but I also see that money is theirs, not mine to worry over, and I also see that it is what the market will bear. So long as people continue to give them ridiculous amounts of money for their crap, they will continue to gather ridiculous amounts of money from those people. If folks want to make a change, then stop shopping there or buying whatever product they're selling - or, demand a more reasonable price, or else go elsewhere. We MAKE these oligarchs, and then sit back and complain about it. A better choice is to not make them in the first place. We didn't just "stumble" in to this situation, we MADE it.

Socialism will not fix that. It will only create new oligarchs (as it always has), only give us NEW Masters to complain about. Socialism is just a different form of capitalism, one where different people suck the value out of you, with the added bonus that they can mow MAKE you give up that value to them, whether you want to or not. You can no longer "just go fishing" when they screw you over. You no longer have the freedom to exercise that option under socialism. The next "Five Year Plan" requires that you work for The Man whether you want to or not.

It's just another form of capitalism, with the added dimension of feudalism and slavery. Ask a Russian some time how wonderful their socialist worker's paradise was, and how well that wealth got redistributed down to them... and why, if it was so great, they finally abandoned it as unworkable. It might be an eye-opener.

.

I'm good with capitalism, as long as it hasn't been monopolized. 

And that's what's happened.

There were supposed to be laws preventing these things.

The problem is, things are so bad that our government isn't actually lead by the president. It's lead Blackrock, Vanguard, and Morgan. Johnson & Johnson has more influence and control than the damn president. These companies make the rules. 

We've allowed it to happen.

We should un-allow it. 
We shouldn't struggle to keep food on the table after working 40+ hours, while these bosses are living 100times better than their employees. 

This, my friends, is modern day slavery. Imo

This isn't much different from the old coal miners days, and how those employees, and their families, were treated and lived. 

We still have slave mentality here in the west. It's just glammed up a bit, so it doesn't look like slavery.

I wonder.... how many homes and families are living paycheck to paycheck. Knowing that the loss of one weeks pay could bring their lives crashing down.

We as Americans should take care of the people better. We have let this happen because we keep saying, "It's okay. Go back to work."

I'm just tired of it. I'd take from those "TPTB" and I would spread it out amongst the people. I don't covet what they have for myself. I covet it for all of us who slave away for peanuts.

Added explanation: I'm not a commie. I'm not a socialist. I'm not anything that can be put into one of their boxes. I am an individual who is part of a collective. 

I care about the collective.

Bally02 brought this to my attention. I want to place it here, as I example of what I mean.

Not much has changed...

https://www.britannica.com/event/Eureka-Stockade
Eureka Stockade, rebellion (December 3, 1854) in which gold prospectors in Ballarat, Victoria, Australia—who sought various reforms, notably the abolition of mining licenses—clashed with government forces. It was named for the rebels’ hastily constructed fortification in the Eureka goldfield. The Eureka Stockade was the most-celebrated rebellion in Australian history.
The rebellion was the culmination of long-standing grievances on the part of the miners, or “diggers,” over exorbitant prospecting-license fees, brutal police procedures for collecting those fees, lack of the vote, and lack of representation in the Legislative Council. While Charles J. La Trobe, the lieutenant governor of Victoria who had introduced the license fee in 1851, pressed the Legislative Council for reform on these issues, the diggers underwent increased harassment by the police and responded with greater militancy. The murder of a digger named James Scobie in October 1854 and the acquittal of his alleged killers by a government board of inquiry further inflamed the situation. Demonstrations and clashes with the police followed. On November 11 the diggers formed the Ballarat Reform League to petition the new lieutenant governor Charles Hotham for redress of their grievances. Although Hotham’s response was promising, the arrival of troop reinforcements on November 28 led to further clashes.

(This is the longest post I've ever seen lol)

We are still having relatively the same issues almost 200 years later. Yet, we keep letting it happen.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Schmoe - 09-04-2024

@"FlickerOfLight"#259 

I like my job mostly.  We made parts for the suspension on the Mars Rover, which of course was interesting.  I didn't think anything of it at the time when the customer was JPL.  Which makes it all the more frustrating that the people I work with ruin it.  I get it, it's a machine shop.  I don't expect to work with Einsteins and Nobel laureates.  But at the same time, fuck.  Whatever happened to pride in your work?


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - FlickerOfLight - 09-04-2024

Growth of CEO compensation (1978–2020). Using the realized compensation measure, compensation of the top CEOs increased 1,322.2% from 1978 to 2020 (adjusting for inflation). Top CEO compensation grew roughly 60% faster than stock market growth during this period and far eclipsed the slow 18.0% growth in a typical worker’s annual compensation. CEO granted compensation rose 970.2% from 1978 to 2020.

Now add in all the inflation over the years for the working class.

https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-in-2020/

This is the problem. We shouldn't be struggling like this. 

It's not that people don't want to work hard. It's that they're tired of getting breadcrumbs for their hard work. I know that I've always felt this way about it when I'd get my meezly little paychecks (after busting my butt), and then see how much of it was used for taxes. Then Every week it's, stretch stretch, stretch (and with little growth to my possessions). This is so many people's lives that are about to snap. Because, things are about to be stretched even further. 

No election is going to save it.

To me, even choosing to do a months worth of work in two weeks, and then wait two more weeks before I receive that due payment is going to screw my entire system up. I *depend* on weekly overtime. As do many others.

Without it the ship sinks. No matter how "hard I work."

I don't see this going well, if ever put up on the block for companies. I don't see why any of them would turn that down. 

Our pro is a more flexible schedule. 

Whoopee

(09-04-2024, 08:53 PM)Schmoe Wrote: @"FlickerOfLight"#259 

I like my job mostly.  We made parts for the suspension on the Mars Rover, which of course was interesting.  I didn't think anything of it at the time when the customer was JPL.  Which makes it all the more frustrating that the people I work with ruin it.  I get it, it's a machine shop.  I don't expect to work with Einsteins and Nobel laureates.  But at the same time, fuck.  Whatever happened to pride in your work?

I 100 percent agree with, "Whatever happened to pride in our work."

I'm one, like you, who does take pride in my work. No matter how big or small the job is. 

Like you I'm surrounded by people who have no pride in anything, much less their job, and so I step up my game because I have to pick up the slack.

So, we work harder, with more frustration, with no raises coming our way for our extra effort.

-----------------------

That's really cool. I've never done any machine work quite like that.

So, you  machined parts for the Mars rover? Wow...that's really remarkable, Schmoe. Cheers


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Schmoe - 09-04-2024

(09-04-2024, 09:29 PM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Growth of CEO compensation (1978–2020). Using the realized compensation measure, compensation of the top CEOs increased 1,322.2% from 1978 to 2020 (adjusting for inflation). Top CEO compensation grew roughly 60% faster than stock market growth during this period and far eclipsed the slow 18.0% growth in a typical worker’s annual compensation. CEO granted compensation rose 970.2% from 1978 to 2020.

Now add in all the inflation over the years for the working class.

https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-in-2020/

This is the problem. We shouldn't be struggling like this. 

It's not that people don't want to work hard. It's that they're tired of getting breadcrumbs for their hard work. I know that I've always felt this way about it when I'd get my meezly little paychecks (after busting my butt), and then see how much of it was used for taxes. Then Every week it's, stretch stretch, stretch (and with little growth to my possessions). This is so many people's lives that are about to snap. Because, things are about to be stretched even further. 

No election is going to save it.

To me, even choosing to do a months worth of work in two weeks, and then wait two more weeks before I receive that due payment is going to screw my entire system up. I *depend* on weekly overtime. As do many others.

Without it the ship sinks. No matter how "hard I work."

I don't see this going well, if ever put up on the block for companies. I don't see why any of them would turn that down. 

Our pro is a more flexible schedule. 

Whoopee

(09-04-2024, 08:53 PM)Schmoe Wrote: @"FlickerOfLight"#259 

I like my job mostly.  We made parts for the suspension on the Mars Rover, which of course was interesting.  I didn't think anything of it at the time when the customer was JPL.  Which makes it all the more frustrating that the people I work with ruin it.  I get it, it's a machine shop.  I don't expect to work with Einsteins and Nobel laureates.  But at the same time, fuck.  Whatever happened to pride in your work?

I 100 percent agree with, "Whatever happened to pride in our work."

I'm one, like you, who does take pride in my work. No matter how big or small the job is. 

Like you I'm surrounded by people who have no pride in anything, much less their job, and so I step up my game because I have to pick up the slack.

So, we work harder, with more frustration, with no raises coming our way for our extra effort.


That's really cool. I've never done any machine work quite like that.

So, you  machined parts for the Mars rover? Wow...that's avmjnd blow, Schmoe. Cheers

That's it exactly, the frustration that comes along with working with people like that.  I'm tired of doing other people's jobs for them.

We make all different types of springs, from tiny torsion springs, springs that go into reels for mid-air refueling, to springs that separate the booster for submarine-based tomahawk missiles.  The particular springs that went into the Mars Rover suspension were wide constant force springs.  It was a very simple part, but it was cool to be a part of it.

A good example of doing other people's jobs for them:  basically we set up a machine for a particular part, then samples are sent to an inspection office, they get approved, then the parts are ran off.  

I had an inspector come out and give me shit for a part having the wrong stencil on it.  I didn't set the machine up, the parameters of the part aren't specified except for a few things like inside diameter, length, etc.  I said, so I have to do my job, the person who set up the machine's job, the supervisor's job, AND your job.  How does that make sense?  I laughed at him and told him to get fucked.  Never heard another peep about it at least.  And I'm not arrogant and I hate tooting my own horn, but I've made scrap parts twice in the 10 years I've been here, so I was pretty pissed.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - FlickerOfLight - 09-05-2024

(09-04-2024, 10:05 PM)Schmoe Wrote:
(09-04-2024, 09:29 PM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Growth of CEO compensation (1978–2020). Using the realized compensation measure, compensation of the top CEOs increased 1,322.2% from 1978 to 2020 (adjusting for inflation). Top CEO compensation grew roughly 60% faster than stock market growth during this period and far eclipsed the slow 18.0% growth in a typical worker’s annual compensation. CEO granted compensation rose 970.2% from 1978 to 2020.

Now add in all the inflation over the years for the working class.

https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-in-2020/

This is the problem. We shouldn't be struggling like this. 

It's not that people don't want to work hard. It's that they're tired of getting breadcrumbs for their hard work. I know that I've always felt this way about it when I'd get my meezly little paychecks (after busting my butt), and then see how much of it was used for taxes. Then Every week it's, stretch stretch, stretch (and with little growth to my possessions). This is so many people's lives that are about to snap. Because, things are about to be stretched even further. 

No election is going to save it.

To me, even choosing to do a months worth of work in two weeks, and then wait two more weeks before I receive that due payment is going to screw my entire system up. I *depend* on weekly overtime. As do many others.

Without it the ship sinks. No matter how "hard I work."

I don't see this going well, if ever put up on the block for companies. I don't see why any of them would turn that down. 

Our pro is a more flexible schedule. 

Whoopee

(09-04-2024, 08:53 PM)Schmoe Wrote: @"FlickerOfLight"#259 

I like my job mostly.  We made parts for the suspension on the Mars Rover, which of course was interesting.  I didn't think anything of it at the time when the customer was JPL.  Which makes it all the more frustrating that the people I work with ruin it.  I get it, it's a machine shop.  I don't expect to work with Einsteins and Nobel laureates.  But at the same time, fuck.  Whatever happened to pride in your work?

I 100 percent agree with, "Whatever happened to pride in our work."

I'm one, like you, who does take pride in my work. No matter how big or small the job is. 

Like you I'm surrounded by people who have no pride in anything, much less their job, and so I step up my game because I have to pick up the slack.

So, we work harder, with more frustration, with no raises coming our way for our extra effort.


That's really cool. I've never done any machine work quite like that.

So, you  machined parts for the Mars rover? Wow...that's avmjnd blow, Schmoe. Cheers

That's it exactly, the frustration that comes along with working with people like that.  I'm tired of doing other people's jobs for them.

We make all different types of springs, from tiny torsion springs, springs that go into reels for mid-air refueling, to springs that separate the booster for submarine-based tomahawk missiles.  The particular springs that went into the Mars Rover suspension were wide constant force springs.  It was a very simple part, but it was cool to be a part of it.

A good example of doing other people's jobs for them:  basically we set up a machine for a particular part, then samples are sent to an inspection office, they get approved, then the parts are ran off.  

I had an inspector come out and give me shit for a part having the wrong stencil on it.  I didn't set the machine up, the parameters of the part aren't specified except for a few things like inside diameter, length, etc.  I said, so I have to do my job, the person who set up the machine's job, the supervisor's job, AND your job.  How does that make sense?  I laughed at him and told him to get fucked.  Never heard another peep about it at least.  And I'm not arrogant and I hate tooting my own horn, but I've made scrap parts twice in the 10 years I've been here, so I was pretty pissed.

I can imagine; if I've goofed, I know it, own up to it, and fix it immediately. Rarely do my own mistakes get by me. I can imagine you are meticulous as well. Jobs like that don't usually* hire slack workers. But, here we are, eh?

Another good point you made is, now we are expected to do three or four additional jobs that weren't even in our job descriptions. All because companies are hiring labor as cheap as possible. So, they're getting what they paid for. And anyone who has a kick of self pride steps up and does whatever necessary to get the job done, and done right. And yeah, I may make a few dollars more for my efforts, but in the long run, I'm getting worked like a rented mule and beat the hell up from "hustling" for 33 years already. I'm not even close to being done yet. 

I am worried about our future. It does not look good, no matter how its looked at. Globally. There's not anywhere to even flee to, that I can see. I'm not rolling in dough, so I don't have any bunkers in New Zealand for when they finally decide to push them buttons.

Im annoyed with this.  Cool ya know.

Cheers.


RE: More Worker Opression coming soon. Project 2025 - Schmoe - 09-05-2024

(09-05-2024, 03:44 AM)FlickerOfLight Wrote:
(09-04-2024, 10:05 PM)Schmoe Wrote:
(09-04-2024, 09:29 PM)FlickerOfLight Wrote: Growth of CEO compensation (1978–2020). Using the realized compensation measure, compensation of the top CEOs increased 1,322.2% from 1978 to 2020 (adjusting for inflation). Top CEO compensation grew roughly 60% faster than stock market growth during this period and far eclipsed the slow 18.0% growth in a typical worker’s annual compensation. CEO granted compensation rose 970.2% from 1978 to 2020.

Now add in all the inflation over the years for the working class.

https://www.epi.org/publication/ceo-pay-in-2020/

This is the problem. We shouldn't be struggling like this. 

It's not that people don't want to work hard. It's that they're tired of getting breadcrumbs for their hard work. I know that I've always felt this way about it when I'd get my meezly little paychecks (after busting my butt), and then see how much of it was used for taxes. Then Every week it's, stretch stretch, stretch (and with little growth to my possessions). This is so many people's lives that are about to snap. Because, things are about to be stretched even further. 

No election is going to save it.

To me, even choosing to do a months worth of work in two weeks, and then wait two more weeks before I receive that due payment is going to screw my entire system up. I *depend* on weekly overtime. As do many others.

Without it the ship sinks. No matter how "hard I work."

I don't see this going well, if ever put up on the block for companies. I don't see why any of them would turn that down. 

Our pro is a more flexible schedule. 

Whoopee

(09-04-2024, 08:53 PM)Schmoe Wrote: @"FlickerOfLight"#259 

I like my job mostly.  We made parts for the suspension on the Mars Rover, which of course was interesting.  I didn't think anything of it at the time when the customer was JPL.  Which makes it all the more frustrating that the people I work with ruin it.  I get it, it's a machine shop.  I don't expect to work with Einsteins and Nobel laureates.  But at the same time, fuck.  Whatever happened to pride in your work?

I 100 percent agree with, "Whatever happened to pride in our work."

I'm one, like you, who does take pride in my work. No matter how big or small the job is. 

Like you I'm surrounded by people who have no pride in anything, much less their job, and so I step up my game because I have to pick up the slack.

So, we work harder, with more frustration, with no raises coming our way for our extra effort.


That's really cool. I've never done any machine work quite like that.

So, you  machined parts for the Mars rover? Wow...that's avmjnd blow, Schmoe. Cheers

That's it exactly, the frustration that comes along with working with people like that.  I'm tired of doing other people's jobs for them.

We make all different types of springs, from tiny torsion springs, springs that go into reels for mid-air refueling, to springs that separate the booster for submarine-based tomahawk missiles.  The particular springs that went into the Mars Rover suspension were wide constant force springs.  It was a very simple part, but it was cool to be a part of it.

A good example of doing other people's jobs for them:  basically we set up a machine for a particular part, then samples are sent to an inspection office, they get approved, then the parts are ran off.  

I had an inspector come out and give me shit for a part having the wrong stencil on it.  I didn't set the machine up, the parameters of the part aren't specified except for a few things like inside diameter, length, etc.  I said, so I have to do my job, the person who set up the machine's job, the supervisor's job, AND your job.  How does that make sense?  I laughed at him and told him to get fucked.  Never heard another peep about it at least.  And I'm not arrogant and I hate tooting my own horn, but I've made scrap parts twice in the 10 years I've been here, so I was pretty pissed.

I can imagine; if I've goofed, I know it, own up to it, and fix it immediately. Rarely do my own mistakes get by me. I can imagine you are meticulous as well. Jobs like that don't usually* hire slack workers. But, here we are, eh?

Another good point you made is, now we are expected to do three or four additional jobs that weren't even in our job descriptions. All because companies are hiring labor as cheap as possible. So, they're getting what they paid for. And anyone who has a kick of self pride steps up and does whatever necessary to get the job done, and done right. And yeah, I may make a few dollars more for my efforts, but in the long run, I'm getting worked like a rented mule and beat the hell up from "hustling" for 33 years already. I'm not even close to being done yet. 

I am worried about our future. It does not look good, no matter how its looked at. Globally. There's not anywhere to even flee to, that I can see. I'm not rolling in dough, so I don't have any bunkers in New Zealand for when they finally decide to push them buttons.

Im annoyed with this.  Cool ya know.

Cheers.

That's right.  When I started here, I worked my ass off to try and stand out, because I'd heard of layoffs every once in a while.  My daughter had just been born, so I got it into my head that I have to go in there every day and give 110%, I'm now responsible for a life.  

I survived 3 layoffs in the first 2 years, but that was a double-edged sword.  On one side, I proved my value, but also screwed myself because they now expect that effort all the time.  Which I was happy to do.  Fast forward 8 years, and I find out some half-ass who'd been hired a few years ago was making the same amount I was.  I erupted, told them they'd either make it right, or they won't, and either way I'll be better off.  

They made it right, but it's still stuck in my mind that I was getting screwed for years.  "Why can't we find loyal employees anymore?" I've slowed down quite a bit at year 10, I got that large raise, smiled and thanked them, but at the same time I'm thinking that's the end of them getting 110%.

To your point about cheap labor-  my brother is a roofer, started out with a decent-sized company, learned all he could, then went out on his own.  He was successful for years, but then everyone started hiring immigrants, legal or not, and paying them pennies.  He said it got so cutthroat that he had to do the same and hire people who'd work for less, just to win bids on jobs to keep going.  Even that failed though, and he went to a different company as an estimator.

You're right, I'm worried about the future too.  Especially for my kids.  It feels like once a week I get thoughts about how their lives are going to be decades from now.  I can't say they're optimistic thoughts.  I stress to them all the time, it's vital they do well in school.  Don't be like me, and be a shithead when you're young.  You'll likely pay for that fun for the rest of your life. 

Another recurring thought I have is how I'd love to just pack up and run away from it all, set up a homestead and live the way humans were supposed to.  I doubt my daughters would agree though, they're established in their school with friends.  They'd never want to leave modern conveniences behind either.  I didn't think that way either when I was young.