Quote:The ability to efficiently deliver mRNA to the lung would have applications for vaccine development, gene therapy, and more. Here, Suberi et al. showed that such mRNA delivery can be accomplished by encapsulating mRNAs of interest within optimized poly(amine-co-ester) polyplexes. Polyplex-delivered mRNAs were efficiently translated into protein in the lungs of mice with limited evidence of toxicity. This platform was successfully applied as an intranasal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, eliciting robust immune responses that conferred protection against subsequent viral challenge. These results highlight the potential of this delivery system for vaccine applications and beyond. 

Quote:Yale University researchers have developed a new airborne method for delivering mRNA right to your lungs. The team has also used the method to vaccinate mice intranasally, opening the door for human testing in the near future.

While scientists are hailing the creation as an easy way to vaccinate the masses, critics wonder if the development of an airborne vaccine could be used for nefarious purposes, including covert bioenhancements, which have already been recommended in academic literature.

By releasing the vaccine in the air, there’s no need to inject each person individually – which is not only time-consuming but difficult if an individual objects to the shot. This isn’t the case with an airborne vaccine, which can be released into the air without consent or even the public’s knowledge.

A similar strategy is being used with mRNA in shrimp, which are too small and numerous to be injected individually. Instead, an oral “nanovaccine” was created to stop the spread of a virus. Shai Ufaz, chief executive officer of ViAqua, which developed the technology, stated:

Quote:Oral delivery is the holy grail of aquaculture health development due to both the impossibility of vaccinating individual shrimp and its ability to substantially bring down the operational costs of disease management while improving outcomes…

[b]Bioethics study promotes covert, compulsory bioenhancement

[/b]

Adding to the story is academic endorsement of the use of compulsory, covert bioenhancements. Writing in the journal [i]Bioethics[/i], Parker Crutchfield with Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, discusses moral bioenhancements, which refers to the use of biomedical means to trigger moral improvements.
Drug treatments, including vaccines, and genetic engineering are potential examples of bioenhancements. Further, according to Crutchfield:

Quote:It is necessary to morally bioenhance the population in order to prevent ultimate harm. Moral bioenhancement is the potential practice of influencing a person’s moral behavior by way of biological intervention upon their moral attitudes, motivations, or dispositions.
The technology that may permit moral bioenhancement is on the scale between nonexistent and nascent, but common examples of potential interventions include infusing water supplies with pharmaceuticals that enhance empathy or altruism or otherwise intervening on a person’s emotions or motivations, in an attempt to influence the person’s moral behavior.

Some argue that moral bioenhancements should be compulsory for the greater good. Crutchfield believes this doesn’t go far enough. He also wants them to be covert:

Quote:I take this argument one step further, arguing that if moral bioenhancement ought to be compulsory, then its administration ought to be covert rather than overt. This is to say that it is morally preferable for compulsory moral bioenhancement to be administered without the recipients knowing that they are receiving the enhancement.

He even goes so far as to suggest “a covert compulsory program promotes values such as liberty, utility, equality and autonomy better than an overt program does.” So here we have evidence of academic support for covertly releasing drugs and other bioenhancements onto the public. This, combined with the creation of an airborne mRNA vaccine and the government’s history of experimenting on the public, paints an unsettling picture of the future.

(10-02-2023, 02:44 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: I would put this in the same category with the Naxi gas chambers. 

I would also consider this to be criminal, and a call to arms.

(10-02-2023, 03:16 PM)Snarl Wrote:

(10-02-2023, 02:44 PM)NightskyeB4Dawn Wrote: I would put this in the same category with the Naxi gas chambers. 

I would also consider this to be criminal, and a call to arms.

It's the military aged males flooding into our country we need to not lose sight of.

I think the vaccinations are a blatant attempt to invoke a violent response. Just have to be VERY careful going that route ... and if you do ... exactly where and how that violence is directed ... not to mention controlled. I would not 'happily' FAFO unless I had a stash of Stinger missiles and a team to suppress airfields from providing any rapid response.

Most mayors are able to summon a paramilitary force of cops in all black uniforms. Their numbers are significant. If you have to take something like that on, I hope there's an effective rat-trap to catch the mayor and his staff in. Then you've got the right people to beat useful information out of.

(10-02-2023, 09:06 PM)Ninurta Wrote: "Scientists" may be the High priests of the New World religion, but they are not gods. Should they start tinkering with people on such a mass scale, they ought by rights to get tinkered back with, with extreme prejudice.

(10-02-2023, 10:57 PM)Snarl Wrote:

(10-02-2023, 09:06 PM)Ninurta Wrote: "Scientists" may be the High priests of the New World religion, but they are not gods. Should they start tinkering with people on such a mass scale, they ought by rights to get tinkered back with, with extreme prejudice.

But, they did already.

I remember quite vividly being told I wasn't going home if I wasn't vaxxed.

Let me add: I heard a theory today that the forced compliance over COVID-19 was an effort to separate the compliant from the hard core. The next time ... what if ... the bug really is a killer and the vaccine is the only thing that'll save you? How many could die trying not to be fooled a second time?