+- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: The Conspiracy Corner (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=72)
+--- Forum: UFOs, Aliens and Universal Questions (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=75)
+--- Thread: Some more UFO stuff (/showthread.php?tid=74)
RE: Some more UFO stuff - F2d5thCav - 06-13-2025
One more comment about a claim in the WSJ article. Re: the "EMP test".
AFAIK, that doesn't wash. EMP doesn't "shut equipment down" ... it fries electronics and damages even heavy duty electrical equipment like the kind found at power stations.
From what I recall of the Malstrom AFB case, SAC was able to bring the missiles back on line after the event ended. That indicates that whatever damage occurred, it was minor ... not the after effects of an EMP hit.
Not only that, but even a localized EMP blast should have caused all kinds of problems in the adjacent city of Great Falls.
WSJ article reeks of disinfo.
RE: Some more UFO stuff - 727Sky - 06-18-2025
RE: Some more UFO stuff - 727Sky - 06-21-2025
Quote:In this video we talk about all the strange and unexplained discoveries that hint towards alien life in the past. We're talking about ancient encounters, not with beasts or rival tribes, but with something... else. Something that defied explanation, something that descended from the sky, and left an indelible mark on the earliest human civilizations! 0:00 Intro 0:40 Aliens in Prehistoric India 2:32 The Alien Gods of Teotihuacan 7:07 The Great UFO Battle of 1561 9:48 Zoroaster: Prophet or Alien Patsy? 13:17 The Sky Battle of 1665 16:26 Puritans and Aliens Don’t Mix! 20:23 The Sky Beings of Australia 23:19 Did Aliens Steal the Maya? 25:27 The Seductive Japanese Alien 28:35 The First Abduction
RE: Some more UFO stuff - 727Sky - 06-21-2025
RE: Some more UFO stuff - Bally002 - 06-21-2025
This is different. Gonna be a long watch.
Cheers
Bally)
RE: Some more UFO stuff - 727Sky - 06-25-2025
RE: Some more UFO stuff - Bally002 - 06-25-2025
(06-25-2025, 04:55 AM)727Sky Wrote:Lengthy interview. Nothing really new from Ross that I haven't heard before except it's the first time I've heard him using swear words during an interview. Or at anytime for that matter. I hope he isn't getting too emotionally involved in his work.
That could unravel him. He was always a polite man to be taken seriously. In saying that his occasional use of an expletive wasn't loud.
Kind regards,
Bally)
RE: Some more UFO stuff - 727Sky - 06-25-2025
The gloves are off. In this no-holds-barred episode of WEAPONIZED, Jeremy and George dismantle one of the most brazen propaganda efforts in recent memory - The Wall Street Journal’s calculated hit piece on the UFO issue and the brave individuals exposing it. What was pitched as serious journalism quickly revealed itself as an orchestrated campaign of disinformation, one which seems to have been designed and dictated by one man - a bitter, thin-skinned scientist who seems to have despised the topic he was assigned to investigate but is incapable of cutting the cord. The Journal’s first article was loaded with false claims, recycled debunkery, and distortions lifted straight from the Pentagon’s denial playbook. When those lies were challenged by military veterans, whistleblowers, and researchers - with facts and receipts - the Journal didn’t correct a single word. Instead, they doubled down with a second piece, this time personally targeting and attempting to discredit the scientists, intelligence officers, and investigators who have devoted their lives to exploring the truth. At the very heart of the UFO mystery is the long, well documented connection between the unknown craft and nuclear technology, in particular, nuclear weapons. It is likely the most serious, and most unnerving aspect of the larger UFO mystery. The Journal attempted to haughtily dismiss 80 years of alarming and dangerous intrusions into highly restricted airspaces with a single, demonstrably false, one-size-fits-all explanation. We confront the lies head-on, with the help of legendary researcher Robert Hastings - author of UFOs and Nukes - who brings over 150 direct government witnesses, testifying UFO interference with U.S. nuclear arsenals, and who was recently contacted by the FBI over the seriousness of his findings. Also joining the fight is Marik von Rennenkampff, former DoD analyst and opinion writer for The Hill, who exposes the WSJ’s reporting in a meticulous, point by point dismantling of a what appears to be a preposterous effort to reverse engineer the history of UFO intrusions of US nuclear missile installations, a ham-fisted propaganda campaign that mirrors similar efforts emanating from AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) a failed program with even less credibility than its long ago predecessor Project Blue Book. This episode isn’t just a rebuttal - it’s a warning. The Wall Street Journal chose a side, and it wasn’t the truth.
RE: Some more UFO stuff - 727Sky - 06-28-2025
Quote:Late one afternoon near Buga, Colombia, people noticed this strange sphere flying through the sky... a treasure hunter José Restrepo was simply metal‑detecting when that same sphere plummeted from the sky, sparking a power line and landing at his feet.
RE: Some more UFO stuff - gortex - 06-28-2025
Video of a curious UFO sighting from Pembroke Boston filmed on Wednesday by a woman out by her hot tub.
No comment from the FAA other than they had no reports of any debris from a crash.
Beats me.
RE: Some more UFO stuff - FCD - 06-28-2025
It's a helicopter. You can see the anti-collision strobes at the rear of the fuselage.
This video is a good example of something else also. It illustrates why eyewitness accounts in aviation accidents are erroneous "more than 90%" of the time. The helo looks like it's headed straight down, but it's not. It's actually in level flight slightly descending. I spoke with an NTSB investigator a while back and he was telling me the minute an eyewitness starts describing anything about direction or angle they will still document it, but it rarely weighs heavily in their investigation findings (because of exactly the above). They are far more interested in things like reports of smoke and/or sounds. Things like orientation in flight, direction and velocity they primarily rely on black box (FDR) (if applicable) and/or radar data.
RE: Some more UFO stuff - 727Sky - 06-29-2025
RE: Some more UFO stuff - sailorsam - 06-30-2025
thought this was kute
RE: Some more UFO stuff - F2d5thCav - 06-30-2025
sailorsam--
Most have issues grappling with "basic" reality. Acknowledging the phenomena would mean confronting deep fears and defeating instinctive avoidance of the "others". Too much psychologically at stake so denial is the order of the day.